Similar and Alternative 3D Printers to MakerBot Method X
Categories- Pros 👍Dual Extrusion, Large Touchscreen and High PrecisionPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 7000Build Volume 📏300 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎10 µmCons 👎Expensive & Large FootprintPrint Quality 🎨9.5Ease of Use 💻8.5Reliability 🔨9📏 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X
- Pros 👍Dual Extrusion, Large Build Volume, High Precision, Dual Extrusion Capability and Enclosed Build ChamberPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 10000Build Volume 📏330 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎20 µmCons 👎Expensive, Large Footprint and Very ExpensivePrint Quality 🎨9.8 🟢Ease of Use 💻9 🟢Reliability 🔨9.5 🟢📏 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X🎨 produces higher quality prints than MakerBot Method X💻 is easier to use than MakerBot Method X🔨 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X💰 is more durable than MakerBot Method X⭐ is rated higher than MakerBot Method X
- Pros 👍Huge Build Volume, Dual Extrusion and High PrecisionPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 5000Build Volume 📏305 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎10 µmCons 👎Expensive & HeavyPrint Quality 🎨9.2Ease of Use 💻8.5Reliability 🔨9📏 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X⭐ is rated higher than MakerBot Method X
- Pros 👍Large Build Volume, Advanced Material Compatibility, Air Filtration System, Dual Extrusion, Material Station, High-Quality Prints, Enclosed Build Chamber and Advanced Material ManagementPrinting Technology 💡FFFMax Price 💲Under $10000Build Volume 📏330 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎20 µmCons 👎Very Expensive, Steep Learning Curve, Expensive and Limited To Proprietary MaterialsPrint Quality 🎨9.8 🟢Ease of Use 💻8.5Reliability 🔨9.5 🟢📏 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X🎨 produces higher quality prints than MakerBot Method X🔨 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X💰 is more durable than MakerBot Method X⭐ is rated higher than MakerBot Method X
- Pros 👍Excellent Print Quality, Dual Extrusion, Reliable, High Precision and Wide Material CompatibilityPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 5000Build Volume 📏230 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎20 µmCons 👎High Price, Closed Material System, Expensive and Enclosed Printing Area Not StandardPrint Quality 🎨9Ease of Use 💻9 🟢Reliability 🔨9.5 🟢📏 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X💻 is easier to use than MakerBot Method X🔨 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X💰 is more durable than MakerBot Method X⭐ is rated higher than MakerBot Method X
- Pros 👍High-Temperature Capable, Large Build Volume and Industrial ReliabilityPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 5000Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎20 µmCons 👎Very Expensive & Steep Learning CurvePrint Quality 🎨9.5Ease of Use 💻7.5Reliability 🔨9.5 🟢🔨 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X💰 is more durable than MakerBot Method X⭐ is rated higher than MakerBot Method X
- Pros 👍Enclosed Chamber With HEPA Filter, High Reliability, Educational Resources, User-Friendly, Enclosed Design, Reliable Performance, Reliable, Easy To Use and HEPA FilterPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 2000Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎50 µm 🟢Cons 👎Expensive, Limited Build Volume For Price, Limited Material Options, Expensive Proprietary Filaments and Limited Build VolumePrint Quality 🎨8.5Ease of Use 💻9.5 🟢Reliability 🔨9.5 🟢🔎 has a higher resolution than MakerBot Method X💻 is easier to use than MakerBot Method X🔨 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X💰 is more durable than MakerBot Method X
- Pros 👍Independent Dual Extruder, High Precision, Large Build Volume and Independent Dual Extruder SystemPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 5000Build Volume 📏420 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎50 µm 🟢Cons 👎Expensive, Steep Learning Curve and Steep Learning Curve For Advanced FeaturesPrint Quality 🎨9Ease of Use 💻7.5Reliability 🔨8.5📏 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X🔎 has a higher resolution than MakerBot Method X
- Pros 👍Huge Build Volume, High Precision and IDEX SystemPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 10000Build Volume 📏300 mm³ 🟢Print Resolution 🔎10 µmCons 👎Very High Price & Steep Learning CurvePrint Quality 🎨9.5Ease of Use 💻7Reliability 🔨9📏 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X💰 is more durable than MakerBot Method X⭐ is rated higher than MakerBot Method X
- Pros 👍Ultra-Fast Printing Speeds, Multi-Material Capability, Advanced AI Features, High-Speed Printing, Auto Material Switching, Extremely Fast Printing, AI Monitoring and AI-AssistedPrinting Technology 💡FDMMax Price 💲Under 1500Build Volume 📏~Print Resolution 🔎50 µm 🟢Cons 👎Expensive, Requires Proprietary Filament For Full Features, Expensive For Hobbyists, New Brand With Limited Track Record, High Price and Limited Community SupportPrint Quality 🎨9Ease of Use 💻8.5Reliability 🔨9🔎 has a higher resolution than MakerBot Method X⭐ is rated higher than MakerBot Method X
- The printing technology of Raise3D Pro3 is FDM. 👉 undefined. The price of Raise3D Pro3 is 5999. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than Raise3D Pro3. The build volume of Raise3D Pro3 is 300. 👍 Raise3D Pro3 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X. The minimum print resolution of Raise3D Pro3 is 10. 👎 MakerBot Method X has a higher resolution than Raise3D Pro3. The print quality score for Raise3D Pro3 is 9.5. 👉 MakerBot Method X produces the same quality prints as Raise3D Pro3. The ease of use score for Raise3D Pro3 is 8.5. 👉 MakerBot Method X is as easy to use as Raise3D Pro3. The reliability score for Raise3D Pro3 is 9. 👉 MakerBot Method X is as reliable as Raise3D Pro3.
- The printing technology of Ultimaker S5 is FDM. 👉 undefined. The price of Ultimaker S5 is 5995. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than Ultimaker S5. The build volume of Ultimaker S5 is 330. 👍 Ultimaker S5 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X. The minimum print resolution of Ultimaker S5 is 20. 👉 MakerBot Method X has the same resolution as Ultimaker S5. The print quality score for Ultimaker S5 is 9.8. 👍 Ultimaker S5 produces higher quality prints than MakerBot Method X. The ease of use score for Ultimaker S5 is 9. 👍 Ultimaker S5 is easier to use than MakerBot Method X. The reliability score for Ultimaker S5 is 9.5. 👍 Ultimaker S5 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X.
- The printing technology of Raise3D Pro2 is FDM. 👉 undefined. The price of Raise3D Pro2 is 3999. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than Raise3D Pro2. The build volume of Raise3D Pro2 is 305. 👍 Raise3D Pro2 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X. The minimum print resolution of Raise3D Pro2 is 10. 👎 MakerBot Method X has a higher resolution than Raise3D Pro2. The print quality score for Raise3D Pro2 is 9.2. 👎 MakerBot Method X produces higher quality prints than Raise3D Pro2. The ease of use score for Raise3D Pro2 is 8.5. 👉 MakerBot Method X is as easy to use as Raise3D Pro2. The reliability score for Raise3D Pro2 is 9. 👉 MakerBot Method X is as reliable as Raise3D Pro2.
- The printing technology of Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is FFF. 👍 undefined. The price of Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 9550. 👍 Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is more affordable than MakerBot Method X. The build volume of Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 330. 👍 Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X. The minimum print resolution of Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 20. 👉 MakerBot Method X has the same resolution as Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle. The print quality score for Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 9.8. 👍 Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle produces higher quality prints than MakerBot Method X. The ease of use score for Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 8.5. 👉 MakerBot Method X is as easy to use as Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle. The reliability score for Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is 9.5. 👍 Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle is more reliable than MakerBot Method X.
- The printing technology of Ultimaker S3 is FDM. 👉 undefined. The price of Ultimaker S3 is 3850. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than Ultimaker S3. The build volume of Ultimaker S3 is 230. 👍 Ultimaker S3 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X. The minimum print resolution of Ultimaker S3 is 20. 👉 MakerBot Method X has the same resolution as Ultimaker S3. The print quality score for Ultimaker S3 is 9. 👎 MakerBot Method X produces higher quality prints than Ultimaker S3. The ease of use score for Ultimaker S3 is 9. 👍 Ultimaker S3 is easier to use than MakerBot Method X. The reliability score for Ultimaker S3 is 9.5. 👍 Ultimaker S3 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X.
- The printing technology of Fusion3 F410 is FDM. 👉 undefined. The price of Fusion3 F410 is 4599. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than Fusion3 F410. The build volume of Fusion3 F410 is . 👎 MakerBot Method X has a smaller build volume than Fusion3 F410. The minimum print resolution of Fusion3 F410 is 20. 👉 MakerBot Method X has the same resolution as Fusion3 F410. The print quality score for Fusion3 F410 is 9.5. 👉 MakerBot Method X produces the same quality prints as Fusion3 F410. The ease of use score for Fusion3 F410 is 7.5. 👎 MakerBot Method X is easier to use than Fusion3 F410. The reliability score for Fusion3 F410 is 9.5. 👍 Fusion3 F410 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X.
- The printing technology of Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is FDM. 👉 undefined. The price of Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 1799. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than Dremel DigiLab 3D45. The build volume of Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is . 👎 MakerBot Method X has a smaller build volume than Dremel DigiLab 3D45. The minimum print resolution of Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 50. 👍 Dremel DigiLab 3D45 has a higher resolution than MakerBot Method X. The print quality score for Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 8.5. 👎 MakerBot Method X produces higher quality prints than Dremel DigiLab 3D45. The ease of use score for Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 9.5. 👍 Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is easier to use than MakerBot Method X. The reliability score for Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is 9.5. 👍 Dremel DigiLab 3D45 is more reliable than MakerBot Method X.
- The printing technology of BCN3D Sigma D25 is FDM. 👉 undefined. The price of BCN3D Sigma D25 is 3995. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than BCN3D Sigma D25. The build volume of BCN3D Sigma D25 is 420. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X. The minimum print resolution of BCN3D Sigma D25 is 50. 👍 BCN3D Sigma D25 has a higher resolution than MakerBot Method X. The print quality score for BCN3D Sigma D25 is 9. 👎 MakerBot Method X produces higher quality prints than BCN3D Sigma D25. The ease of use score for BCN3D Sigma D25 is 7.5. 👎 MakerBot Method X is easier to use than BCN3D Sigma D25. The reliability score for BCN3D Sigma D25 is 8.5. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more reliable than BCN3D Sigma D25.
- The printing technology of Raise3D Pro3 Plus is FDM. 👉 undefined. The price of Raise3D Pro3 Plus is 5999. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than Raise3D Pro3 Plus. The build volume of Raise3D Pro3 Plus is 300. 👍 Raise3D Pro3 Plus has a smaller build volume than MakerBot Method X. The minimum print resolution of Raise3D Pro3 Plus is 10. 👎 MakerBot Method X has a higher resolution than Raise3D Pro3 Plus. The print quality score for Raise3D Pro3 Plus is 9.5. 👉 MakerBot Method X produces the same quality prints as Raise3D Pro3 Plus. The ease of use score for Raise3D Pro3 Plus is 7. 👎 MakerBot Method X is easier to use than Raise3D Pro3 Plus. The reliability score for Raise3D Pro3 Plus is 9. 👉 MakerBot Method X is as reliable as Raise3D Pro3 Plus.
- The printing technology of Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is FDM. 👉 undefined. The price of Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 1449. 👎 MakerBot Method X is more affordable than Bambu Lab X1 Carbon. The build volume of Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is . 👎 MakerBot Method X has a smaller build volume than Bambu Lab X1 Carbon. The minimum print resolution of Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 50. 👍 Bambu Lab X1 Carbon has a higher resolution than MakerBot Method X. The print quality score for Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 9. 👎 MakerBot Method X produces higher quality prints than Bambu Lab X1 Carbon. The ease of use score for Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 8.5. 👉 MakerBot Method X is as easy to use as Bambu Lab X1 Carbon. The reliability score for Bambu Lab X1 Carbon is 9. 👉 MakerBot Method X is as reliable as Bambu Lab X1 Carbon.