82 Airplanes with more seats than ATR 72-600
Categories- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥853 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.3 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Ultimate Passenger Capacity & Quiet CabinCons ➖Limited Airport Compatibility & High Operating Costs
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥605 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.1 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Iconic Design, Excellent Range and Cargo CapabilityCons ➖High Fuel Consumption & Maintenance Costs
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥550 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Proven Track Record & RangeCons ➖Fuel Consumption & Size Restrictions
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥475 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Excellent Range, Quiet Cabin and ReliableCons ➖High Fuel Consumption & Limited Production
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥440 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Spacious Cabin, Advanced Avionics and Great RangeCons ➖High Acquisition Cost, Complex Maintenance and Limited Airport Compatibility
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥440 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.5 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Advanced Materials & Quiet CabinCons ➖High Acquisition Cost & Maintenance Complexity
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥440 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Proven Track Record, Flexible Cabin Configuration and Good RangeCons ➖Higher Fuel Burn Than Newer Aircraft & Older Technology
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥426 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Advanced Folding Wingtips, Spacious Cabin and High Fuel EfficiencyCons ➖High Acquisition Cost & Limited Route Flexibility
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥426 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽4 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Massive Capacity, Advanced Technology and Excellent RangeCons ➖Very High Purchase Cost & Limited Airport Compatibility
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥416 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Reliable Performance, Spacious Cabin, Iconic Design and Versatile Cargo CapabilityCons ➖High Fuel Consumption, Aging Fleet, Maintenance Costs and Limited Modern Amenities
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥410 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.6 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Large Payload & VersatilityCons ➖High Fuel Consumption & Complex Systems
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥400 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Extended Range, Reliable Performance and Spacious CabinCons ➖High Operating Costs & Older Technology
- Manufacturer 🏢LockheedSeating Capacity 👥400 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Advanced Systems, Passenger Comfort and Safety FeaturesCons ➖Complex Maintenance, Limited Production and Spare Parts
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥384 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.5 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Ultra-Long Range, Premium Comfort and Large Cargo CapacityCons ➖High Purchase Price & Complex Systems
- Manufacturer 🏢McDonnell DouglasSeating Capacity 👥380 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Good Range, Cargo Capacity and Passenger ComfortCons ➖High Maintenance, Fuel Inefficiency and Dated Systems
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥350 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.4 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Proven Reliability, Cargo Conversion Potential and Strong FrameCons ➖Older Technology & Higher Fuel Consumption
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥330 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽4.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Advanced Composites, Large Windows, Lower Cabin Pressure and Better Air QualityCons ➖High Maintenance Costs & Battery Issues In Early Models
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥330 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.4 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Reduced Jet Lag Features, Large Windows and Clean Air SystemCons ➖High Initial Cost & Limited Cargo Space
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥314 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.9 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Ultra Long Range, Reliable Operation and Spacious CabinCons ➖Higher Operating Costs & Fuel Consumption
- Manufacturer 🏢IlyushinSeating Capacity 👥300 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Long Range, Large Capacity and Robust DesignCons ➖High Fuel Consumption & Limited Western Support
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥290 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽4.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Advanced Composite Materials, Large Windows and Better Air QualityCons ➖Higher Maintenance Costs & Complex Systems
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥287 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Advanced Technology, Spacious Cabin and Good RangeCons ➖Higher Maintenance Costs & Complex Systems
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥270 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Advanced Technology, Quiet Cabin and Fuel EfficientCons ➖High Purchase Cost & Limited Route Network