Compact mode
Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A300-600 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
Airbus A300-600- First twin-engine widebody
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Last commercial tri-jet by McDonnell Douglas
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
Airbus A300-600- Too old to retire too young to collect pension
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Known as the plane that wanted three engines because it was greedy
Commercial Comparison
Price 💰
Current market price of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Wide BodyWide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeFor all*Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillFor all*Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyBoeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- ReliabilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
Airbus A300-600- First Airbus AircraftAirbus A300-600 is known for First Airbus Aircraft.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Tri-Engine DesignMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Tri-Engine Design.
- Cargo ConversionMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Cargo Conversion.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
Airbus A300-600- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
- Cargo Capability
- Durable
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Cargo Capacity
- Passenger Comfort
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Higher Fuel Consumption
Airbus A300-600- Dated Technology
- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
- Fuel Inefficiency
- Dated Systems
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Alternatives to Boeing 767-300ER
Airbus A330-200F
Known for Cargo Capacity
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A300-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A300-600
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A300-600
🛡
is safer than Airbus A300-600
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A300-600
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A300-600
BAe 146-200
Known for Quiet Operation,STOL Capability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A300-600
🛡
is safer than Airbus A300-600
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A300-600
Boeing 737-200
Known for Durability
🛡
is safer than Airbus A300-600
Dornier 328JET
Known for German Engineering
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A300-600
🛡
is safer than Airbus A300-600
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A300-600
Airbus A340-600
Known for Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A300-600
👥
has more seats than Airbus A300-600
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A300-600
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A300-600
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A300-600
🛡
is safer than Airbus A300-600
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A300-600
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A300-600
Airbus A320
Known for Best-Selling Narrowbody,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A300-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A300-600
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A300-600
🛡
is safer than Airbus A300-600
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A300-600
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A300-600
Airbus A350-1000
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Advanced Technology
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A300-600
👥
has more seats than Airbus A300-600
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A300-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A300-600
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A300-600
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A300-600
🛡
is safer than Airbus A300-600
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A300-600
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A300-600
Airbus A350-900
Known for Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A300-600
👥
has more seats than Airbus A300-600
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A300-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A300-600
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A300-600
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A300-600
🛡
is safer than Airbus A300-600
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A300-600
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A300-600