Compact mode
Airbus A310-300 vs BAe 146-200 vs Bombardier CRJ-100
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A310-300- First Airbus with Two-Crew Digital Cockpit
BAe 146-200- Only successful British commercial jet
Bombardier CRJ-100- First successful regional jet
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Looks like a shrunk A300 that went through the wash
BAe 146-200- The Whisperjet that couldn't whisper profits
Bombardier CRJ-100- Makes passengers feel like sardines in style
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A310-300- Narrow BodyAirbus A310-300 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
BAe 146-200- Regional JetBAe 146-200 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
Bombardier CRJ-100- Regional JetBombardier CRJ-100 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A310-300- Regional CarriersAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Mid-Size AirlinesAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Mid-Size Airlines.
BAe 146-200- Regional AirlinesBAe 146-200 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- City OperationsBAe 146-200 is primarily operated by City Operations. Aircraft optimized for urban airport operations, emphasizing quick turnaround Click to see all.
Bombardier CRJ-100- Regional AirlinesBombardier CRJ-100 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Short-Haul TravelersBombardier CRJ-100 is primarily operated by Short-Haul Travelers. Aircraft specialized in efficient short-distance flights with passenger comfort Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A310-300- Medium-Haul RoutesAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.
- Cargo OperationsAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Cargo Operations.
BAe 146-200- Short-HaulBAe 146-200 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Urban RoutesBAe 146-200 is primarily used for Urban Routes. Aircraft optimized for city-to-city flights, emphasizing quick turnaround and efficiency Click to see all.
Bombardier CRJ-100- Regional ConnectionsBombardier CRJ-100 is primarily used for Regional Connections. Aircraft specialized in connecting smaller airports and communities Click to see all.
- Commuter FlightsBombardier CRJ-100 is primarily used for Commuter Flights. Aircraft designed for regular short-distance passenger services Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A310-300 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
BAe 146-200- Quiet OperationBAe 146-200 is known for Quiet Operation.
- STOL CapabilityBAe 146-200 is known for STOL Capability.
Bombardier CRJ-100- Regional EfficiencyBombardier CRJ-100 is known for Regional Efficiency.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Versatile DesignAircraft adaptable to various operational requirements
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Reliable Operations
BAe 146-200- Low Noise Levels
- Short Runway UseAircraft suitable for limited runway length operations
Bombardier CRJ-100- Low Operating Cost
- Quick TurnaroundAircraft optimized for minimal ground time between flights
- Reliable
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Limited ProductionAircraft models produced in small quantities due to various market or manufacturing constraints Click to see all.
- Aging Fleet
- Higher Maintenance Costs
BAe 146-200- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
- Fuel Consumption
Bombardier CRJ-100
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A310-300BAe 146-200Bombardier CRJ-100
Alternatives to Airbus A310-300
Airbus A319
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A330-900Neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Modern Design
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320-100
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321LR
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Range Flexibility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320
Known for Best-Selling Narrowbody,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Boeing 757-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300