Compact mode
Airbus A310-300 vs McDonnell Douglas MD-80 vs Antonov An-158
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A310-300- First Airbus with Two-Crew Digital Cockpit
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Known as the 'Mad Dog'
Antonov An-158- Designed for harsh conditions
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Looks like a shrunk A300 that went through the wash
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- The plane that thinks it's a vacuum cleaner
Antonov An-158- Soviet spirit lives on
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A310-300- Narrow BodyAirbus A310-300 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Narrow BodyMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
Antonov An-158- Regional JetAntonov An-158 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeFor all*Airbus A310-300- Mid-Size AirlinesAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Mid-Size Airlines.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158- GovernmentAntonov An-158 is primarily operated by Government.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A310-300- Medium-Haul RoutesAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.
- Cargo OperationsAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Cargo Operations.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Short-Medium RoutesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily used for Short-Medium Routes.
- High FrequencyMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily used for High Frequency.
Antonov An-158- Medium RoutesAntonov An-158 is primarily used for Medium Routes.
- Special MissionsAntonov An-158 is primarily used for Special Missions.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A310-300 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Rear-Mounted EnginesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is known for Rear-Mounted Engines.
Antonov An-158- Ukrainian DesignAntonov An-158 is known for Ukrainian Design.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Versatile DesignAircraft adaptable to various operational requirements
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Reliable Operations
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Reliable Operation
- Low Acquisition CostAircraft available at competitive initial purchase prices
- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
Antonov An-158- Robust DesignAircraft built for durability and reliability
- High Reliability
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Limited ProductionAircraft models produced in small quantities due to various market or manufacturing constraints Click to see all.
- Aging Fleet
- Higher Maintenance Costs
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Fuel Consumption
- Engine NoiseAircraft with significant engine-generated sound levels Click to see all.
- Aging Technology
Antonov An-158- Political Challenges
- Limited Support
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158
Alternatives to Airbus A310-300
Airbus A319
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A330-900Neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Modern Design
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320-100
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321LR
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Range Flexibility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320
Known for Best-Selling Narrowbody,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Boeing 757-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300