Compact mode
Airbus A320-200 vs Airbus A310-300 vs McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A320-200- First fly-by-wire airliner in widespread use
Airbus A310-300- First Airbus with Two-Crew Digital Cockpit
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Last MD series aircraft
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A320-200- So common pilots could fly it in their sleep
Airbus A310-300- Looks like a shrunk A300 that went through the wash
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- The plane that tried to keep MD relevant
Commercial Comparison
Price 💰
Current market price of the aircraftAirbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Narrow BodySingle-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A320-200- Business TravelersAirbus A320-200 is primarily operated by Business Travelers. Aircraft designed with business passenger needs, offering productivity and comfort Click to see all.
- FamiliesAirbus A320-200 is primarily operated by Families. Aircraft with features catering to family comfort and entertainment Click to see all.
Airbus A310-300- Regional CarriersAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Mid-Size AirlinesAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Mid-Size Airlines.
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Domestic TravelersMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily operated by Domestic Travelers.
- Regional AirlinesMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A320-200- Short-HaulAirbus A320-200 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Medium-HaulAirbus A320-200 is primarily used for Medium-Haul. Aircraft specialized for flights between 3-6 hours duration Click to see all.
Airbus A310-300- Medium-Haul RoutesAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.
- Cargo OperationsAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Cargo Operations.
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Medium-Haul FlightsMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Flights. Aircraft designed for optimal performance on 3-6 hour flights Click to see all.
- Domestic RoutesMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily used for Domestic Routes. Aircraft specialized for national air transportation networks Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A320-200- VersatilityAirbus A320-200 is known for Versatility.
- ReliabilityAirbus A320-200 is known for Reliability.
Airbus A310-300- Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A310-300 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Fuel EfficiencyMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A320-200- Fuel EfficientAircraft optimized for minimal fuel consumption and environmental impact Click to see all.
- Common Type
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
Airbus A310-300- Versatile DesignAircraft adaptable to various operational requirements
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Reliable Operations
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Reliable Performance
- Good Economics
- Low Noise
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A320-200- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Cabin NoiseAircraft with noticeable interior noise levels during flight Click to see all.
- Narrow Aisle
Airbus A310-300- Limited ProductionAircraft models produced in small quantities due to various market or manufacturing constraints Click to see all.
- Aging Fleet
- Higher Maintenance Costs
McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A320-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Alternatives to Airbus A320-200
Airbus A330-900Neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Modern Design
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A319
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321LR
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Range Flexibility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320-100
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320
Known for Best-Selling Narrowbody,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A350-800
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Boeing 757-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300