Compact mode
Boeing 757-200 vs Airbus A310-300 vs McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Boeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Boeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 757-200- Last produced in 2004 but still widely used
Airbus A310-300- First Airbus with Two-Crew Digital Cockpit
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Last MD series aircraft
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 757-200- The plane that refuses to retire
Airbus A310-300- Looks like a shrunk A300 that went through the wash
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- The plane that tried to keep MD relevant
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Narrow BodySingle-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 757-200- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 757-200 is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Charter ServicesBoeing 757-200 is primarily operated by Charter Services.
Airbus A310-300- Regional CarriersAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Mid-Size AirlinesAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Mid-Size Airlines.
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Domestic TravelersMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily operated by Domestic Travelers.
- Regional AirlinesMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 757-200- Medium-Haul RoutesBoeing 757-200 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.
- TranscontinentalBoeing 757-200 is primarily used for Transcontinental. Aircraft designed for efficient continent-spanning flights Click to see all.
Airbus A310-300- Medium-Haul RoutesAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.
- Cargo OperationsAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Cargo Operations.
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Medium-Haul FlightsMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Flights. Aircraft designed for optimal performance on 3-6 hour flights Click to see all.
- Domestic RoutesMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily used for Domestic Routes. Aircraft specialized for national air transportation networks Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyBoeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 757-200- VersatilityBoeing 757-200 is known for Versatility.
- ReliabilityBoeing 757-200 is known for Reliability.
Airbus A310-300- Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A310-300 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Fuel EfficiencyMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 757-200- Excellent Range
- Powerful EnginesAircraft equipped with high-thrust engines for superior performance
- Proven Track Record
Airbus A310-300- Versatile DesignAircraft adaptable to various operational requirements
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Reliable Operations
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Reliable Performance
- Good Economics
- Low Noise
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 757-200- Aging Fleet
- Higher Fuel Consumption
Airbus A310-300- Limited ProductionAircraft models produced in small quantities due to various market or manufacturing constraints Click to see all.
- Aging Fleet
- Higher Maintenance Costs
McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 757-200Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Alternatives to Boeing 757-200
Airbus A319
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A330-900Neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Modern Design
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320-100
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321LR
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Range Flexibility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320
Known for Best-Selling Narrowbody,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A350-800
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A320-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300
Airbus A321neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A310-300
👥
has more seats than Airbus A310-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A310-300
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A310-300
🛡
is safer than Airbus A310-300
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A310-300
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A310-300