Compact mode
Airbus A320-200 vs Airbus A319ceo vs Boeing 737-900ER
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900EREngine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ERFuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ERFuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ERMaximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ERMaximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A320-200- First fly-by-wire airliner in widespread use
Airbus A319ceo- Can operate from unpaved runways
Boeing 737-900ER- Has the longest fuselage of any 737 variant
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A320-200- So common pilots could fly it in their sleep
Airbus A319ceo- Perfect for airports with fancy weight restrictions
Boeing 737-900ER- Known as the TARDIS of aviation - bigger on the inside
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ERSeating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Narrow BodySingle-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A320-200- Business TravelersAirbus A320-200 is primarily operated by Business Travelers. Aircraft designed with business passenger needs, offering productivity and comfort Click to see all.
- FamiliesAirbus A320-200 is primarily operated by Families. Aircraft with features catering to family comfort and entertainment Click to see all.
Airbus A319ceo- Regional TravelersAirbus A319ceo is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Business MarketsAirbus A319ceo is primarily operated by Business Markets.
Boeing 737-900ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Leisure TravelersBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Leisure Travelers. Aircraft optimized for vacation and recreational travel comfort Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A320-200- Short-HaulAirbus A320-200 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Medium-HaulAirbus A320-200 is primarily used for Medium-Haul. Aircraft specialized for flights between 3-6 hours duration Click to see all.
Airbus A319ceo- Short-HaulAirbus A319ceo is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- RegionalAirbus A319ceo is primarily used for Regional. Aircraft optimized for shorter routes between regional airports Click to see all.
Boeing 737-900ER- Short To Medium RoutesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for Short To Medium Routes. Aircraft versatile for both short and medium-distance flights Click to see all.
- High-Frequency FlightsBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for High-Frequency Flights.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ER
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftFor all*- Versatility
Airbus A320-200- ReliabilityAirbus A320-200 is known for Reliability.
Boeing 737-900ER- ReliabilityBoeing 737-900ER is known for Reliability.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A320-200- Fuel EfficientAircraft optimized for minimal fuel consumption and environmental impact Click to see all.
- Common Type
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
Airbus A319ceo- Operational Flexibility
- Good Short-Field PerformanceAircraft excelling in short runway operations and quick stops
- Reliable
Boeing 737-900ER- Proven Track Record
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A320-200- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Cabin NoiseAircraft with noticeable interior noise levels during flight Click to see all.
- Narrow Aisle
Airbus A319ceo- Higher Seat-Mile Costs
- Limited Cargo CapacityAircraft with restricted freight carrying capabilities Click to see all.
Boeing 737-900ER
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ERComfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ERSafety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ERBuy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ERScore ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A320-200Airbus A319ceoBoeing 737-900ER
Alternatives to Airbus A320-200
Airbus A321neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency
👥
has more seats than Airbus A320-200
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A320
Known for Best-Selling Narrowbody,Efficiency
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A320ceo
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A321
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Passenger Comfort
👥
has more seats than Airbus A320-200
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A320-200
👥
has more seats than Airbus A320-200
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A320-200
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A321LR
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Range Flexibility
👥
has more seats than Airbus A320-200
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A319neo
Known for Efficiency,Flexibility
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A318-100
Known for Compact Size,Versatility
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
👥
has more seats than Airbus A320-200
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A320-200