Compact mode
Airbus A320-200 vs Embraer E175 vs Comac C919
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A320-200Embraer E175Comac C919Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A320-200Embraer E175Comac C919Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.For all*Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A320-200Embraer E175Comac C919Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A320-200- First fly-by-wire airliner in widespread use
Embraer E175- First flew in 2004 with reduced weight design
Comac C919- First Chinese-made commercial jetliner
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A320-200- So common pilots could fly it in their sleep
Embraer E175- Known as the regional route money maker because airlines love its economics
Comac C919- Proof that copying homework can sometimes work
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A320-200Embraer E175Comac C919Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A320-200- Narrow BodyAirbus A320-200 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
Embraer E175- Regional JetEmbraer E175 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
Comac C919- Narrow BodyComac C919 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A320-200- Business TravelersAirbus A320-200 is primarily operated by Business Travelers. Aircraft designed with business passenger needs, offering productivity and comfort Click to see all.
- FamiliesAirbus A320-200 is primarily operated by Families. Aircraft with features catering to family comfort and entertainment Click to see all.
Embraer E175- Regional TravelersEmbraer E175 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Business CommutersEmbraer E175 is primarily operated by Business Commuters.
Comac C919- Regional TravelersComac C919 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Budget AirlinesComac C919 is primarily operated by Budget Airlines. Cost-effective aircraft choices for low-cost carriers, maximizing efficiency and capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A320-200- Short-HaulAirbus A320-200 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Medium-HaulAirbus A320-200 is primarily used for Medium-Haul. Aircraft specialized for flights between 3-6 hours duration Click to see all.
Embraer E175- Short-Haul RoutesEmbraer E175 is primarily used for Short-Haul Routes.
- Regional ConnectionsEmbraer E175 is primarily used for Regional Connections. Aircraft specialized in connecting smaller airports and communities Click to see all.
Comac C919- Domestic FlightsComac C919 is primarily used for Domestic Flights. Aircraft optimized for in-country commercial routes Click to see all.
- Short-Haul RoutesComac C919 is primarily used for Short-Haul Routes.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A320-200- VersatilityAirbus A320-200 is known for Versatility.
- ReliabilityAirbus A320-200 is known for Reliability.
Embraer E175- Cabin ComfortEmbraer E175 is known for Cabin Comfort.
- Fuel EfficiencyEmbraer E175 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
Comac C919- Chinese Aviation InnovationComac C919 is known for Chinese Aviation Innovation.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A320-200- Fuel EfficientAircraft optimized for minimal fuel consumption and environmental impact Click to see all.
- Common Type
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
Embraer E175- Excellent Fuel EconomyAircraft with superior fuel consumption efficiency and reduced operating costs
- Low Operating Costs
- Quiet CabinAircraft with enhanced noise reduction in passenger cabin
Comac C919- Cost-Effective
- New Technology
- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A320-200- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Cabin NoiseAircraft with noticeable interior noise levels during flight Click to see all.
- Narrow Aisle
Embraer E175- Limited Range For Longer Routes
- Small Cargo Capacity
Comac C919- Limited Track Record
- Range Limitations
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A320-200Embraer E175Comac C919Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A320-200Embraer E175Comac C919Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A320-200Embraer E175Comac C919
Alternatives to Airbus A320-200
Airbus A321neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency
👥
has more seats than Airbus A320-200
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A320
Known for Best-Selling Narrowbody,Efficiency
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A320ceo
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A321
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Passenger Comfort
👥
has more seats than Airbus A320-200
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A320-200
👥
has more seats than Airbus A320-200
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A320-200
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A321LR
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Range Flexibility
👥
has more seats than Airbus A320-200
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A319neo
Known for Efficiency,Flexibility
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A320-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A320-200
Airbus A318-100
Known for Compact Size,Versatility
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A320-200
Embraer E190
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🚀
flies higher than Airbus A320-200