Compact mode

Airbus A320ceo vs Boeing 757-200 vs Comac C919

Table of content

Basic Information Comparison
Performance Comparison
Facts Comparison
Commercial Comparison

Specifications Comparison
General Comparison
Features Comparison
Ratings Comparison

Basic Information Comparison

Manufacturer 🏢

The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.

Airbus A320ceo

Airbus

Airbus A320ceo is manufactured by Airbus. Airbus produces commercial aircraft known for advanced technology and passenger comfort Click to see all.

Boeing 757-200

Boeing

Boeing 757-200 is manufactured by Boeing. Boeing creates diverse range of commercial and military aircraft with proven reliability Click to see all.

Comac C919

Comac

Comac C919 is manufactured by Comac. Comac creates modern commercial aircraft for growing Chinese aviation market Click to see all.
Engine Type ✈

A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.

For all*

Turbofan

Modern commercial aircraft with efficient bypass ratio engines

Performance Comparison

Maximum Range 🌍

The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.

Airbus A320ceo

3300 nautical miles

Airbus A320ceo can fly up to 3300 nautical miles without refueling. Click to see all.

Boeing 757-200

4500 nautical miles

Boeing 757-200 can fly up to 4500 nautical miles without refueling. Click to see all.

Comac C919

3000 nautical miles

Comac C919 can fly up to 3000 nautical miles without refueling. Click to see all.
Fuel Efficiency ⛽

Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.

Airbus A320ceo

3.5 nautical miles per gallon

The fuel efficiency of Airbus A320ceo is 3.5 nautical miles per gallon. Click to see all.

Boeing 757-200

2.8 nautical miles per gallon

The fuel efficiency of Boeing 757-200 is 2.8 nautical miles per gallon. Click to see all.

Comac C919

2.8 nautical miles per gallon

The fuel efficiency of Comac C919 is 2.8 nautical miles per gallon. Click to see all.
Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽

Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.

For all*

Efficient

Aircraft designed to optimize fuel usage and reduce operating costs
Maximum Altitude 🚀

The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.

Airbus A320ceo

39000 feet

The maximum operating altitude of Airbus A320ceo is 39000 feet. Click to see all.

Boeing 757-200

42000 feet

The maximum operating altitude of Boeing 757-200 is 42000 feet. Click to see all.

Comac C919

39000 feet

The maximum operating altitude of Comac C919 is 39000 feet. Click to see all.
Maximum Altitude Type 🚀

Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.

For all*

High Altitude

High altitude aircraft operate effectively at elevated altitudes with specialized systems

Facts Comparison

Interesting Fact 📖

Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraft

Airbus A320ceo

First fly-by-wire commercial aircraft

Boeing 757-200

Last produced in 2004 but still widely used

Comac C919

First Chinese-made commercial jetliner
Sarcastic Fact 🤣

Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraft

Airbus A320ceo

Still flying while newer planes get grounded

Boeing 757-200

The plane that refuses to retire

Comac C919

Proof that copying homework can sometimes work

Commercial Comparison

Price 💰

Current market price of the aircraft

Airbus A320ceo

101000000 USD

The price of Airbus A320ceo is 101000000.

Boeing 757-200

85000000 USD

The price of Boeing 757-200 is 85000000.

Comac C919

99000000 USD

The price of Comac C919 is 99000000.

Specifications Comparison

Seating Capacity 👥

The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.

Airbus A320ceo

180 seats

Airbus A320ceo can accommodate 180 passengers. Click to see all.

Boeing 757-200

200 seats

Boeing 757-200 can accommodate 200 passengers. Click to see all.

Comac C919

190 seats

Comac C919 can accommodate 190 passengers. Click to see all.
Seating Capacity Type ✈️

Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.

For all*

Narrow Body

Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport

General Comparison

For whom 👤

Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft type

Airbus A320ceo

Mixed Travelers

Airbus A320ceo is primarily operated by Mixed Travelers. Aircraft configured for diverse passenger types and requirements Click to see all.

Boeing 757-200

Commercial Airlines

Boeing 757-200 is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.

Charter Services

Boeing 757-200 is primarily operated by Charter Services.

Comac C919

Regional Travelers

Comac C919 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.

Budget Airlines

Comac C919 is primarily operated by Budget Airlines. Cost-effective aircraft choices for low-cost carriers, maximizing efficiency and capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯

Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfill

Airbus A320ceo

Short-Haul

Airbus A320ceo is primarily used for Short-Haul.

Medium-Haul

Airbus A320ceo is primarily used for Medium-Haul. Aircraft specialized for flights between 3-6 hours duration Click to see all.

Boeing 757-200

Medium-Haul Routes

Boeing 757-200 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.

Transcontinental

Boeing 757-200 is primarily used for Transcontinental. Aircraft designed for efficient continent-spanning flights Click to see all.

Comac C919

Domestic Flights

Comac C919 is primarily used for Domestic Flights. Aircraft optimized for in-country commercial routes Click to see all.

Short-Haul Routes

Comac C919 is primarily used for Short-Haul Routes.
Made In 🏭

Country of manufacture and primary assembly

Airbus A320ceo

France

Airbus A320ceo is manufactured in France. French-manufactured aircraft known for innovative design Click to see all.

Boeing 757-200

USA

Boeing 757-200 is manufactured in USA. American-manufactured aircraft with proven track record Click to see all.

Comac C919

China

Comac C919 is manufactured in China. Aircraft manufactured in China with focus on emerging aviation market Click to see all.

Features Comparison

Known For 💡

Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraft

Airbus A320ceo

Reliability

Airbus A320ceo is known for Reliability.

Boeing 757-200

Versatility

Boeing 757-200 is known for Versatility.

Reliability

Boeing 757-200 is known for Reliability.

Comac C919

Chinese Aviation Innovation

Comac C919 is known for Chinese Aviation Innovation.
Pros ➕

Key advantages and strong points of the aircraft

Airbus A320ceo

Proven Track Record

Cost-Effective

Wide Operator Base

Aircraft used by numerous airlines worldwide

Boeing 757-200

Excellent Range

Powerful Engines

Aircraft equipped with high-thrust engines for superior performance

Proven Track Record

Comac C919

Cost-Effective

New Technology

Simple Maintenance

Aircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
Cons ➖

Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraft

Airbus A320ceo

Older Technology

Aircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.

Limited Range

Aircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.

Boeing 757-200

Aging Fleet

Higher Fuel Consumption

Comac C919

Limited Track Record

Range Limitations