Compact mode
Airbus A350-900 vs Boeing 777X vs Airbus A330-900Neo
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoEngine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoFuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoFuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoMaximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A350-900- Has electrochromic windows
Boeing 777X- Features revolutionary folding wingtips for gate compatibility
Airbus A330-900neo- Features special LED mood lighting system
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A350-900- The plane that makes jet lag bearable
Boeing 777X- Costs more than some small islands
Airbus A330-900neo- Too fancy to fly economy
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoSeating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Wide BodyWide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeFor all*Airbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoPurpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A350-900- Ultra-Long RoutesAirbus A350-900 is primarily used for Ultra-Long Routes. Aircraft specialized in extreme long-distance flights, maximizing range and efficiency Click to see all.
- IntercontinentalAirbus A350-900 is primarily used for Intercontinental.
Boeing 777X- International FlightsBoeing 777X is primarily used for International Flights.
- Premium TravelBoeing 777X is primarily used for Premium Travel. Aircraft featuring luxury amenities and superior comfort Click to see all.
Airbus A330-900neo- International FlightsAirbus A330-900neo is primarily used for International Flights.
- Premium ServiceAirbus A330-900neo is primarily used for Premium Service.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neo
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A350-900- Passenger ComfortAirbus A350-900 is known for Passenger Comfort.
Boeing 777X- World's Largest Twin-Engine JetBoeing 777X is known for World's Largest Twin-Engine Jet.
Airbus A330-900neo- Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A330-900neo is known for Fuel Efficiency.
- Modern DesignAirbus A330-900neo is known for Modern Design.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A350-900- Advanced Materials
- Quiet CabinAircraft with enhanced noise reduction in passenger cabin
Boeing 777X- Advanced Folding Wingtips
- Spacious Cabin
- High Fuel Efficiency
Airbus A330-900neo- Advanced Technology
- Spacious Cabin
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A350-900- High Acquisition CostAircraft requiring significant initial investment Click to see all.
- Maintenance Complexity
Boeing 777X- High Acquisition CostAircraft requiring significant initial investment Click to see all.
- Limited Route Flexibility
Airbus A330-900neo- Higher Maintenance Costs
- Complex Systems
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoComfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoSafety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoBuy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neoScore ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A350-900Boeing 777XAirbus A330-900neo
Alternatives to Airbus A350-900
Airbus A350-1000
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Advanced Technology
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A350-900
🛡
is safer than Airbus A350-900
⏳
is more durable than Airbus A350-900
⭐
is better overall than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A340-600
Known for Passenger Comfort
👥
has more seats than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A330-800Neo
Known for New Generation Efficiency
🌍
flies longer than Airbus A350-900
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A350-900
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A320ceo
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A380
Known for Largest Passenger Aircraft
👥
has more seats than Airbus A350-900
💱
is more comfortable than Airbus A350-900
Boeing 747-8
Known for Queen Of The Skies
👥
has more seats than Airbus A350-900
Airbus A321neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Airbus A350-900
🛡
is safer than Airbus A350-900