Bombardier Q400 vs ATR 42-300 vs ATR 42-500
Compact mode

Bombardier Q400 vs ATR 42-300 vs ATR 42-500

Performance Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 📖

    Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraft
    Bombardier Q400
    • Has active noise and vibration suppression system
    ATR 42-300
    • First ATR aircraft model
    ATR 42-500
    • Best seller in island nations
  • Sarcastic Fact 🤣

    Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraft
    Bombardier Q400
    • Called the muscle car of regional aircraft
    ATR 42-300
    • The flying tractor
    ATR 42-500
    • Slower than walking sometimes

Specifications Comparison

General Comparison

Features Comparison

  • Known For 💡

    Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraft
    Bombardier Q400
    • Performance
      Bombardier Q400 is known for Performance.
    • Versatility
      Bombardier Q400 is known for Versatility.
    ATR 42-300
    • Fuel Economy
      ATR 42-300 is known for Fuel Economy.
    • Reliability
      ATR 42-300 is known for Reliability.
    ATR 42-500
    • Fuel Economy
      ATR 42-500 is known for Fuel Economy.
  • Pros

    Key advantages and strong points of the aircraft
    Bombardier Q400
    • Fast For A Turboprop
    • Good Short-Field Performance
      Aircraft excelling in short runway operations and quick stops
    • Comfortable Cabin
      Aircraft with enhanced passenger comfort features and spacious interior design
    ATR 42-300
    • Economical Operation
    • Simple Maintenance
      Aircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
    ATR 42-500
    • Low Operating Costs
    • Short Runway Capable
      Aircraft designed for operations on compact runways
    • Reliable
  • Cons

    Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraft
    Bombardier Q400
    • Higher Maintenance Costs
    • Noise Levels
    ATR 42-300
    • Speed Limitations
    • Capacity Constraints
    ATR 42-500

Ratings Comparison

Alternatives to Bombardier Q400
ATR 42-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
👥 has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
is more durable than ATR 42-300
is better overall than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
👥 has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-300
👥 has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectiveness
👥 has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop
👥 has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡 is safer than ATR 42-300
is better overall than ATR 42-300
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiency
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡 is safer than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiency
🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-300
👥 has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡 is safer than ATR 42-300
is better overall than ATR 42-300
Airbus A320ceo
Known for Reliability
🔧 is more reliable than ATR 42-300
👥 has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
🚀 flies higher than ATR 42-300
💱 is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡 is safer than ATR 42-300
is more durable than ATR 42-300
is better overall than ATR 42-300
McDonnell Douglas DC-9
Known for Reliability
👥 has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍 flies longer than ATR 42-300
🚀 flies higher than ATR 42-300