Compact mode
Airbus A330-800Neo vs ATR 42-300 vs ATR 72-400
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Airbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A330-800neo- Features the largest passenger windows of any Airbus wide-body
ATR 42-300- First ATR aircraft model
ATR 72-400- Most successful regional aircraft in history
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A330-800neo- The plane that nobody ordered but Airbus built anyway
ATR 42-300- The flying tractor
ATR 72-400- Slower than a sports car but costs 100 times more
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A330-800neo- Wide BodyAirbus A330-800neo is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
ATR 42-300- Regional JetATR 42-300 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
ATR 72-400- Regional JetATR 72-400 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A330-800neo- AirlinesAirbus A330-800neo is primarily operated by Airlines.
- Long-Haul TravelersAirbus A330-800neo is primarily operated by Long-Haul Travelers. Aircraft equipped for maximum comfort during extended journeys Click to see all.
ATR 42-300- Regional AirlinesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Island CommunitiesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Island Communities. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
ATR 72-400- Regional CarriersATR 72-400 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-400 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A330-800neo- Intercontinental FlightsAirbus A330-800neo is primarily used for Intercontinental Flights.
- Pacific RoutesAirbus A330-800neo is primarily used for Pacific Routes. Aircraft capable of crossing Pacific Ocean routes efficiently Click to see all.
ATR 42-300- Short-HaulATR 42-300 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Remote AccessATR 42-300 is primarily used for Remote Access. Aircraft capable of operating in remote and challenging locations Click to see all.
ATR 72-400
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A330-800neo- New Generation EfficiencyAirbus A330-800neo is known for New Generation Efficiency.
ATR 42-300- Fuel EconomyATR 42-300 is known for Fuel Economy.
- ReliabilityATR 42-300 is known for Reliability.
ATR 72-400- Cost EffectivenessATR 72-400 is known for Cost Effectiveness.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A330-800neo- Low Operating Costs
- Advanced Technology
- Quiet CabinAircraft with enhanced noise reduction in passenger cabin
ATR 42-300- Economical Operation
- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
ATR 72-400- Low Operating Costs
- Short Runway Capability
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A330-800neo- Limited Operator BaseAircraft with smaller number of operating airlines Click to see all.
- Higher Crew Training CostsAircraft requiring extensive pilot and crew training investment Click to see all.
ATR 42-300- Speed Limitations
- Capacity Constraints
ATR 72-400
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A330-800neoATR 42-300ATR 72-400
Alternatives to Airbus A330-800neo
ATR 42-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-300
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-300
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economy
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-300
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-300
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-300
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiency
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-300
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-300
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-300
Embraer E175-E2
Known for Efficiency,Modern Design
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
🚀
flies higher than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-300
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-300
Embraer E145
Known for Efficiency,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-300
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
🚀
flies higher than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-300