Compact mode
ATR 42-300 vs Saab 340
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.ATR 42-300Saab 340Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Both*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.ATR 42-300Saab 340Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.ATR 42-300Saab 340Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.ATR 42-300Saab 340Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Both*Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Both*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftATR 42-300- First ATR aircraft model
Saab 340- Originally co-developed with Fairchild
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftATR 42-300- The flying tractor
Saab 340- The Swedish meatball with wings
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.ATR 42-300Saab 340Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Both*- Regional JetRegional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeATR 42-300- Regional AirlinesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Island CommunitiesATR 42-300 is primarily operated by Island Communities. Aircraft suitable for island-hopping and coastal operations Click to see all.
Saab 340- Regional CarriersSaab 340 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Commuter AirlinesSaab 340 is primarily operated by Commuter Airlines.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillATR 42-300- Short-HaulATR 42-300 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Remote AccessATR 42-300 is primarily used for Remote Access. Aircraft capable of operating in remote and challenging locations Click to see all.
Saab 340- Regional RoutesSaab 340 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Feeder ServiceSaab 340 is primarily used for Feeder Service.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoth*- Reliability
ATR 42-300- Fuel EconomyATR 42-300 is known for Fuel Economy.
Saab 340- EfficiencySaab 340 is known for Efficiency.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftATR 42-300- Economical Operation
- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
Saab 340- Low Operating Costs
- Durability
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftATR 42-300- Speed Limitations
- Capacity Constraints
Saab 340
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyATR 42-300Saab 340
Alternatives to ATR 42-300
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-300
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-300
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economy
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-300
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectiveness
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-300
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-300
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-300
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-300
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-300
Airbus A330-800Neo
Known for New Generation Efficiency
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-300
🚀
flies higher than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-300
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-300
Embraer E145
Known for Efficiency,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-300
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-300
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-300
🚀
flies higher than ATR 42-300
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-300
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-300