Compact mode
Airbus A220-500 vs ATR 72-400
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A220-500ATR 72-400Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Airbus A220-500ATR 72-400
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A220-500ATR 72-400Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Both*Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Both*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A220-500ATR 72-400Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A220-500ATR 72-400
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A220-500- First aircraft to feature geared turbofan engines
ATR 72-400- Most successful regional aircraft in history
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A220-500- Perfect for pilots who hate long flights
ATR 72-400- Slower than a sports car but costs 100 times more
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A220-500ATR 72-400Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A220-500- Narrow BodyAirbus A220-500 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
ATR 72-400- Regional JetATR 72-400 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A220-500- Regional TravelersAirbus A220-500 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Business CommutersAirbus A220-500 is primarily operated by Business Commuters.
ATR 72-400- Regional CarriersATR 72-400 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-400 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A220-500- Short-Medium RoutesAirbus A220-500 is primarily used for Short-Medium Routes.
- City PairsAirbus A220-500 is primarily used for City Pairs. Aircraft optimized for specific city-to-city route operations Click to see all.
ATR 72-400
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A220-500- Exceptional Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A220-500 is known for Exceptional Fuel Efficiency.
ATR 72-400- Cost EffectivenessATR 72-400 is known for Cost Effectiveness.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoth*- Low Operating Costs
Airbus A220-500- Advanced Cockpit
- Passenger Comfort
ATR 72-400- Short Runway Capability
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A220-500- Limited Cargo Space
- Range RestrictionsAircraft that cannot operate beyond certain distances without refueling Click to see all.
ATR 72-400
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A220-500ATR 72-400Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A220-500ATR 72-400Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A220-500ATR 72-400
Alternatives to Airbus A220-500
ATR 42-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economy
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 42-300
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
Bombardier CRJ-1000
Known for High Frequency Operations
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
🚀
flies higher than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400