Compact mode
Airbus A320neo vs ATR 72-400 vs ATR 42-600
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Airbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A320neo- Uses 20% less fuel than predecessor
ATR 72-400- Most successful regional aircraft in history
ATR 42-600- Can land on unpaved runways
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A320neo- The plane that made Boeing nervous
ATR 72-400- Slower than a sports car but costs 100 times more
ATR 42-600- Pilots joke it's more reliable than their marriages
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A320neo- Narrow BodyAirbus A320neo is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
ATR 72-400- Regional JetATR 72-400 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
ATR 42-600- Regional JetATR 42-600 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A320neo- Business TravelersAirbus A320neo is primarily operated by Business Travelers. Aircraft designed with business passenger needs, offering productivity and comfort Click to see all.
- Economy TravelersAirbus A320neo is primarily operated by Economy Travelers.
ATR 72-400- Regional CarriersATR 72-400 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-400 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
ATR 42-600- Regional AirlinesATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
- Regional MarketsATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Regional Markets. Airplanes designed specifically for serving regional markets with focus on efficiency and reliability Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A320neo- Short-Medium RoutesAirbus A320neo is primarily used for Short-Medium Routes.
- City PairsAirbus A320neo is primarily used for City Pairs. Aircraft optimized for specific city-to-city route operations Click to see all.
ATR 72-400- Short RangeATR 72-400 is primarily used for Short Range. Aircraft optimized for efficient short-distance flights Click to see all.
- Island RoutesATR 72-400 is primarily used for Island Routes. Aircraft designed for inter-island transportation services Click to see all.
ATR 42-600- Short RoutesATR 42-600 is primarily used for Short Routes. Aircraft designed for efficient short-distance travel Click to see all.
- Remote LocationsATR 42-600 is primarily used for Remote Locations. Aircraft specialized in serving isolated and difficult-to-reach areas Click to see all.
- Short-HaulATR 42-600 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Island RoutesATR 42-600 is primarily used for Island Routes. Aircraft designed for inter-island transportation services Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A320neo- Fuel EfficiencyAirbus A320neo is known for Fuel Efficiency.
ATR 72-400- Cost EffectivenessATR 72-400 is known for Cost Effectiveness.
ATR 42-600- Fuel EfficiencyATR 42-600 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
- ReliabilityATR 42-600 is known for Reliability.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftFor all*- Low Operating Costs
Airbus A320neo- Reliable
ATR 72-400- Short Runway Capability
ATR 42-600- Short Runway Capability
- Robust DesignAircraft built for durability and reliability
- Fuel EfficientAircraft optimized for minimal fuel consumption and environmental impact Click to see all.
- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A320neoATR 72-400- Speed Limitations
- Weather SensitivityAircraft requiring specific weather conditions for safe operation Click to see all.
ATR 42-600- Limited Speed
- Weather SensitivityAircraft requiring specific weather conditions for safe operation Click to see all.
- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Speed RestrictionsAircraft that operate under specific speed constraints Click to see all.
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A320neoATR 72-400ATR 42-600
Alternatives to Airbus A320neo
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economy
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
ATR 42-300
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
Embraer E195
Known for Passenger Comfort,Economics
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
🌍
flies longer than ATR 72-400
🚀
flies higher than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400
Bombardier CRJ-1000
Known for High Frequency Operations
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-400
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-400
🚀
flies higher than ATR 72-400
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-400
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-400
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-400