Compact mode
Saab 340 vs ATR 72-500
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Saab 340ATR 72-500Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Both*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Saab 340ATR 72-500Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Saab 340ATR 72-500Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Saab 340ATR 72-500Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Both*Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Both*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftSaab 340- Originally co-developed with Fairchild
ATR 72-500- Most popular turboprop in its class
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftSaab 340- The Swedish meatball with wings
ATR 72-500- Slower than driving but more scenic
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Saab 340ATR 72-500Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Both*- Regional JetRegional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeSaab 340- Regional CarriersSaab 340 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Commuter AirlinesSaab 340 is primarily operated by Commuter Airlines.
ATR 72-500- Regional TravelersATR 72-500 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-500 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillSaab 340- Regional RoutesSaab 340 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Feeder ServiceSaab 340 is primarily used for Feeder Service.
ATR 72-500
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoth*- Reliability
Saab 340- EfficiencySaab 340 is known for Efficiency.
ATR 72-500- Fuel EfficiencyATR 72-500 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoth*- Low Operating Costs
Saab 340- Durability
ATR 72-500- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
- Good For Short RunwaysAircraft capable of operating from shorter airfields and limited runways Click to see all.
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftSaab 340- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Small CapacityAircraft designed to carry fewer passengers than typical commercial planes Click to see all.
ATR 72-500
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historySaab 340ATR 72-500
Alternatives to Saab 340
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-500
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-500
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-500
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-500
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-500
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-500
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-500
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-500
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-500
ATR 42-300
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-500
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-500
Bombardier Q300
Known for Noise Reduction,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-500
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-500
⏳
is more durable than ATR 72-500
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-500
Airbus A310-300
Known for Fuel Efficiency
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-500
🌍
flies longer than ATR 72-500
🚀
flies higher than ATR 72-500
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-500
Airbus A319
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-500
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-500
🌍
flies longer than ATR 72-500
🚀
flies higher than ATR 72-500
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-500
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-500
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-500