Airbus A330-200F vs BAe 146-200 vs Airbus A300-600
Compact mode

Airbus A330-200F vs BAe 146-200 vs Airbus A300-600

Basic Information Comparison

Performance Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 📖

    Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraft
    Airbus A330-200F
    • Can carry 70 tons of cargo
    BAe 146-200
    • Only successful British commercial jet
    Airbus A300-600
    • First twin-engine widebody
  • Sarcastic Fact 🤣

    Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraft
    Airbus A330-200F
    • Perfect for shipping rubber ducks across oceans
    BAe 146-200
    • The Whisperjet that couldn't whisper profits
    Airbus A300-600
    • Too old to retire too young to collect pension

Specifications Comparison

  • Seating Capacity 👥

    The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.
    Airbus A330-200F
      ~
    BAe 146-200
    Airbus A300-600
  • Seating Capacity Type ✈️

    Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.
    Airbus A330-200F
    • Wide Body
      Airbus A330-200F is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
    BAe 146-200
    • Regional Jet
      BAe 146-200 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
    Airbus A300-600
    • Wide Body
      Airbus A300-600 is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights

General Comparison

Features Comparison

Alternatives to Airbus A330-200F
BAe 146
Known for Quiet Operation
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
Dornier 328JET
Known for German Engineering
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
Bombardier CRJ-900
Known for Reliability,Cost Efficiency
🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200
is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200
👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146-200
ATR 42-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
Bombardier CRJ-500
Known for Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
🛡 is safer than BAe 146-200
Bombardier CRJ-550
Known for Comfort,Efficiency
is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146-200
🛡 is safer than BAe 146-200
is more durable than BAe 146-200
is better overall than BAe 146-200
Airbus A310-300
Known for Fuel Efficiency
👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
Boeing 737-200
Known for Durability
👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
Bombardier CRJ-100
Known for Regional Efficiency
🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
🛡 is safer than BAe 146-200