Compact mode
Boeing 717-200 vs Boeing 767-300ER vs Airbus A300-600
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Boeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Boeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 717-200- Last MD aircraft design
Boeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
Airbus A300-600- First twin-engine widebody
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 717-200- Identity crisis - born MD95 died Boeing 717
Boeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
Airbus A300-600- Too old to retire too young to collect pension
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Boeing 717-200- Narrow BodyBoeing 717-200 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
Boeing 767-300ER- Wide BodyBoeing 767-300ER is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
Airbus A300-600- Wide BodyAirbus A300-600 is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 717-200- Regional CarriersBoeing 717-200 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Short-Haul TravelersBoeing 717-200 is primarily operated by Short-Haul Travelers. Aircraft specialized in efficient short-distance flights with passenger comfort Click to see all.
Boeing 767-300ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Airbus A300-600- Medium-Haul PassengersAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Medium-Haul Passengers. Aircraft designed for optimal comfort on medium-length flights Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 717-200- Quick TurnaroundBoeing 717-200 is primarily used for Quick Turnaround. Aircraft designed for rapid ground handling and maintenance Click to see all.
- Frequent ServiceBoeing 717-200 is primarily used for Frequent Service. Aircraft optimized for high-frequency route operations Click to see all.
Boeing 767-300ER- Long-Haul RoutesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Airbus A300-600- Regional RoutesAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyBoeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 717-200- ReliabilityBoeing 717-200 is known for Reliability.
Boeing 767-300ER- ReliabilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
Airbus A300-600- First Airbus AircraftAirbus A300-600 is known for First Airbus Aircraft.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 717-200- Low MaintenanceAircraft requiring minimal maintenance effort and resources
- Passenger Comfort
- Durability
Boeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
Airbus A300-600- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
- Cargo Capability
- Durable
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 717-200- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Small CapacityAircraft designed to carry fewer passengers than typical commercial planes Click to see all.
Boeing 767-300ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Higher Fuel Consumption
Airbus A300-600
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 717-200Boeing 767-300ERAirbus A300-600
Alternatives to Boeing 717-200
McDonnell Douglas DC-9
Known for Reliability
👥
has more seats than Boeing 717-200
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 717-200
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 717-200
👥
has more seats than Boeing 717-200
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 717-200
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 717-200
🛡
is safer than Boeing 717-200
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 717-200
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 717-200
McDonnell Douglas MD-80
Known for Rear-Mounted Engines
👥
has more seats than Boeing 717-200
Airbus A320ceo
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 717-200
👥
has more seats than Boeing 717-200
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 717-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 717-200
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 717-200
🛡
is safer than Boeing 717-200
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 717-200
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 717-200
Airbus A320
Known for Best-Selling Narrowbody,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 717-200
👥
has more seats than Boeing 717-200
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 717-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 717-200
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 717-200
🛡
is safer than Boeing 717-200
Embraer E190-E1
Known for Efficiency,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 717-200
👥
has more seats than Boeing 717-200
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 717-200
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 717-200
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 717-200
Boeing 757-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
👥
has more seats than Boeing 717-200
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 717-200
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 717-200
Boeing 797
Known for Market Flexibility,Operating Economics
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 717-200
👥
has more seats than Boeing 717-200
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 717-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 717-200
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 717-200
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 717-200
🛡
is safer than Boeing 717-200
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 717-200
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 717-200
👥
has more seats than Boeing 717-200
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 717-200
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 717-200
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 717-200
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 717-200