Compact mode
Boeing 737-900ER vs Airbus A320-100 vs Comac C919
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 737-900ERAirbus A320-100Comac C919Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 737-900ERAirbus A320-100Comac C919Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.For all*Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Boeing 737-900ERAirbus A320-100Comac C919Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 737-900ERAirbus A320-100Comac C919Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- Has the longest fuselage of any 737 variant
Airbus A320-100- First A320 family member produced
Comac C919- First Chinese-made commercial jetliner
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- Known as the TARDIS of aviation - bigger on the inside
Airbus A320-100- Still flying despite being replaced by newer versions
Comac C919- Proof that copying homework can sometimes work
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 737-900ERAirbus A320-100Comac C919Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Narrow BodySingle-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 737-900ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Leisure TravelersBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Leisure Travelers. Aircraft optimized for vacation and recreational travel comfort Click to see all.
Airbus A320-100- Business TravelersAirbus A320-100 is primarily operated by Business Travelers. Aircraft designed with business passenger needs, offering productivity and comfort Click to see all.
- Leisure TravelersAirbus A320-100 is primarily operated by Leisure Travelers. Aircraft optimized for vacation and recreational travel comfort Click to see all.
Comac C919- Regional TravelersComac C919 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Budget AirlinesComac C919 is primarily operated by Budget Airlines. Cost-effective aircraft choices for low-cost carriers, maximizing efficiency and capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 737-900ER- Short To Medium RoutesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for Short To Medium Routes. Aircraft versatile for both short and medium-distance flights Click to see all.
- High-Frequency FlightsBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for High-Frequency Flights.
Airbus A320-100- Short-Haul RoutesAirbus A320-100 is primarily used for Short-Haul Routes.
- Medium-Haul RoutesAirbus A320-100 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.
Comac C919- Domestic FlightsComac C919 is primarily used for Domestic Flights. Aircraft optimized for in-country commercial routes Click to see all.
- Short-Haul RoutesComac C919 is primarily used for Short-Haul Routes.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- ReliabilityBoeing 737-900ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 737-900ER is known for Versatility.
Airbus A320-100- ReliabilityAirbus A320-100 is known for Reliability.
Comac C919- Chinese Aviation InnovationComac C919 is known for Chinese Aviation Innovation.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- Proven Track Record
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
Airbus A320-100- Fuel EfficientAircraft optimized for minimal fuel consumption and environmental impact Click to see all.
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
- Common Type Rating
Comac C919- Cost-Effective
- New Technology
- Simple MaintenanceAircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Limited Overhead Space
Airbus A320-100- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.
- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
Comac C919- Limited Track Record
- Range Limitations
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 737-900ERAirbus A320-100Comac C919Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 737-900ERAirbus A320-100Comac C919
Alternatives to Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 757-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 767-300ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
Embraer E190
Known for Reliability,Versatility
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A320-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A320ceo
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 707-320B
Known for First Successful Commercial Jet
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER