Compact mode
Airbus A320ceo vs Boeing 737-900ER vs Boeing 767-300ER
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300EREngine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ERFuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ERFuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ERMaximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ERMaximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ER
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A320ceo- First fly-by-wire commercial aircraft
Boeing 737-900ER- Has the longest fuselage of any 737 variant
Boeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A320ceo- Still flying while newer planes get grounded
Boeing 737-900ER- Known as the TARDIS of aviation - bigger on the inside
Boeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ERSeating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A320ceo- Narrow BodyAirbus A320ceo is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
Boeing 737-900ER- Narrow BodyBoeing 737-900ER is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
Boeing 767-300ER- Wide BodyBoeing 767-300ER is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Leisure TravelersBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Leisure Travelers. Aircraft optimized for vacation and recreational travel comfort Click to see all.
Boeing 767-300ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A320ceo- Short-HaulAirbus A320ceo is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Medium-HaulAirbus A320ceo is primarily used for Medium-Haul. Aircraft specialized for flights between 3-6 hours duration Click to see all.
Boeing 737-900ER- Short To Medium RoutesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for Short To Medium Routes. Aircraft versatile for both short and medium-distance flights Click to see all.
- High-Frequency FlightsBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for High-Frequency Flights.
Boeing 767-300ER- Long-Haul RoutesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ER
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftFor all*- Reliability
Boeing 737-900ER- VersatilityBoeing 737-900ER is known for Versatility.
Boeing 767-300ER- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A320ceo- Proven Track Record
- Cost-Effective
- Wide Operator BaseAircraft used by numerous airlines worldwide
Boeing 737-900ER- Proven Track Record
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
Boeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftFor all*Airbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ER- Limited Overhead Space
Boeing 767-300ER- Higher Fuel Consumption
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ERComfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ERSafety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ERBuy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ERScore ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A320ceoBoeing 737-900ERBoeing 767-300ER
Alternatives to Airbus A320ceo
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 757-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
Embraer E190
Known for Reliability,Versatility
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A319ceo
Known for Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 707-320B
Known for First Successful Commercial Jet
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 777X
Known for World's Largest Twin-Engine Jet
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER