Compact mode
Airbus A330-300 vs Boeing 737-900ER vs Bombardier CRJ-900
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.For all*Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A330-300- Has never had a fatal accident during commercial operations
Boeing 737-900ER- Has the longest fuselage of any 737 variant
Bombardier CRJ-900- Popular in North American market
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A330-300- Sometimes called the flying pencil due to its long thin fuselage
Boeing 737-900ER- Known as the TARDIS of aviation - bigger on the inside
Bombardier CRJ-900- The regional workhorse that never quits
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A330-300- Wide BodyAirbus A330-300 is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
Boeing 737-900ER- Narrow BodyBoeing 737-900ER is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
Bombardier CRJ-900- Regional JetBombardier CRJ-900 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A330-300- International CarriersAirbus A330-300 is primarily operated by International Carriers. Aircraft optimized for long-haul international transportation services Click to see all.
- Charter OperatorsAirbus A330-300 is primarily operated by Charter Operators.
Boeing 737-900ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Leisure TravelersBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Leisure Travelers. Aircraft optimized for vacation and recreational travel comfort Click to see all.
Bombardier CRJ-900- Regional OperatorsBombardier CRJ-900 is primarily operated by Regional Operators.
- Feeder ServicesBombardier CRJ-900 is primarily operated by Feeder Services. Aircraft specialized for short-haul routes connecting to major hubs Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A330-300- Long-Haul RoutesAirbus A330-300 is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- High-Density RoutesAirbus A330-300 is primarily used for High-Density Routes.
Boeing 737-900ER- Short To Medium RoutesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for Short To Medium Routes. Aircraft versatile for both short and medium-distance flights Click to see all.
- High-Frequency FlightsBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for High-Frequency Flights.
Bombardier CRJ-900- Short ConnectionsBombardier CRJ-900 is primarily used for Short Connections.
- Hub FeedingBombardier CRJ-900 is primarily used for Hub Feeding. Aircraft optimized for routes connecting to major airports Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftFor all*- Reliability
Airbus A330-300- VersatilityAirbus A330-300 is known for Versatility.
Boeing 737-900ER- VersatilityBoeing 737-900ER is known for Versatility.
Bombardier CRJ-900- Cost EfficiencyBombardier CRJ-900 is known for Cost Efficiency.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A330-300- Proven Track Record
- Flexible Cabin ConfigurationAircraft with adaptable interior layouts for different operations Click to see all.
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
Boeing 737-900ER- Proven Track Record
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
Bombardier CRJ-900- Proven Platform
- Good Economics
- Easy Crew Transition
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A330-300- Higher Fuel Burn Than Newer AircraftLess fuel-efficient aircraft compared to modern alternatives Click to see all.
- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
Boeing 737-900ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Limited Overhead Space
Bombardier CRJ-900
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A330-300Boeing 737-900ERBombardier CRJ-900
Alternatives to Airbus A330-300
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 757-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 767-300ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
Embraer E190
Known for Reliability,Versatility
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A320-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 707-320B
Known for First Successful Commercial Jet
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A320ceo
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER