Compact mode
Boeing 737-900ER vs McDonnell Douglas MD-80 vs COMAC ARJ21
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- Has the longest fuselage of any 737 variant
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Known as the 'Mad Dog'
COMAC ARJ21- First modern Chinese commercial jet
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- Known as the TARDIS of aviation - bigger on the inside
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- The plane that thinks it's a vacuum cleaner
COMAC ARJ21- Great Wall of Aviation
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Boeing 737-900ER- Narrow BodyBoeing 737-900ER is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Narrow BodyMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
COMAC ARJ21- Regional JetCOMAC ARJ21 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 737-900ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Leisure TravelersBoeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Leisure Travelers. Aircraft optimized for vacation and recreational travel comfort Click to see all.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Regional CarriersMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Domestic AirlinesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily operated by Domestic Airlines. Aircraft optimized for domestic routes, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
COMAC ARJ21- Regional CarriersCOMAC ARJ21 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Domestic RoutesCOMAC ARJ21 is primarily operated by Domestic Routes. Aircraft suited for domestic flight operations, emphasizing reliability Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 737-900ER- Short To Medium RoutesBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for Short To Medium Routes. Aircraft versatile for both short and medium-distance flights Click to see all.
- High-Frequency FlightsBoeing 737-900ER is primarily used for High-Frequency Flights.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Short-Medium RoutesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily used for Short-Medium Routes.
- High FrequencyMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily used for High Frequency.
COMAC ARJ21- Short-Medium RoutesCOMAC ARJ21 is primarily used for Short-Medium Routes.
- Domestic FlightsCOMAC ARJ21 is primarily used for Domestic Flights. Aircraft optimized for in-country commercial routes Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyBoeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- ReliabilityBoeing 737-900ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 737-900ER is known for Versatility.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Rear-Mounted EnginesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is known for Rear-Mounted Engines.
COMAC ARJ21- Chinese Aviation EntryCOMAC ARJ21 is known for Chinese Aviation Entry.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- Proven Track Record
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Reliable Operation
- Low Acquisition CostAircraft available at competitive initial purchase prices
- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
COMAC ARJ21- Low Acquisition CostAircraft available at competitive initial purchase prices
- Domestic Support
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 737-900ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Limited Overhead Space
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Fuel Consumption
- Engine NoiseAircraft with significant engine-generated sound levels Click to see all.
- Aging Technology
COMAC ARJ21
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 737-900ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-80COMAC ARJ21
Alternatives to Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 757-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
Boeing 767-300ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
👥
has more seats than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
Embraer E190
Known for Reliability,Versatility
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A320-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A320ceo
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 737-900ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 737-900ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 737-900ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 737-900ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 737-900ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 737-900ER