Boeing 737-900ER vs Boeing 757-200 vs Comac C919
Compact mode

Boeing 737-900ER vs Boeing 757-200 vs Comac C919

Basic Information Comparison

Performance Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 📖

    Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraft
    Boeing 737-900ER
    • Has the longest fuselage of any 737 variant
    Boeing 757-200
    • Last produced in 2004 but still widely used
    Comac C919
    • First Chinese-made commercial jetliner
  • Sarcastic Fact 🤣

    Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraft
    Boeing 737-900ER
    • Known as the TARDIS of aviation - bigger on the inside
    Boeing 757-200
    • The plane that refuses to retire
    Comac C919
    • Proof that copying homework can sometimes work

Specifications Comparison

General Comparison

Features Comparison

  • Known For 💡

    Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraft
    Boeing 737-900ER
    • Reliability
      Boeing 737-900ER is known for Reliability.
    • Versatility
      Boeing 737-900ER is known for Versatility.
    Boeing 757-200
    • Versatility
      Boeing 757-200 is known for Versatility.
    • Reliability
      Boeing 757-200 is known for Reliability.
    Comac C919
    • Chinese Aviation Innovation
      Comac C919 is known for Chinese Aviation Innovation.
  • Pros

    Key advantages and strong points of the aircraft
    Boeing 737-900ER
    • Proven Track Record
    • Easy Maintenance
      Aircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
    • Good Range
      Aircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
    Boeing 757-200
    • Excellent Range
    • Powerful Engines
      Aircraft equipped with high-thrust engines for superior performance
    • Proven Track Record
    Comac C919
    • Cost-Effective
    • New Technology
    • Simple Maintenance
      Aircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
  • Cons

    Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraft
    Boeing 737-900ER
    Boeing 757-200
    • Aging Fleet
    • Higher Fuel Consumption
    Comac C919
    • Limited Track Record
    • Range Limitations
Alternatives to Boeing 737-900ER
Airbus A320-100
Known for Reliability
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 737-300
Known for Reliability
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
💱 is more comfortable than Boeing 757-200
🛡 is safer than Boeing 757-200
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A318
Known for Smallest A320 Family Member
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 767-300ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
👥 has more seats than Boeing 757-200
🌍 flies longer than Boeing 757-200
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 757-200
🚀 flies higher than Boeing 757-200
🛡 is safer than Boeing 757-200
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A310-300
Known for Fuel Efficiency
👥 has more seats than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A320-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
💱 is more comfortable than Boeing 757-200
🛡 is safer than Boeing 757-200
is more durable than Boeing 757-200
is better overall than Boeing 757-200