Embraer E175 vs Boeing 757-200 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9
Compact mode

Embraer E175 vs Boeing 757-200 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Table of content

Performance Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 📖
    Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraft
    Embraer E175
    • First flew in 2004 with reduced weight design
    Boeing 757-200
    • Last produced in 2004 but still widely used
    McDonnell Douglas DC-9
    • Can operate from short runways

  • Sarcastic Fact 🤣
    Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraft
    Embraer E175
    • Known as the regional route money maker because airlines love its economics
    Boeing 757-200
    • The plane that refuses to retire
    McDonnell Douglas DC-9
    • Called the 'Beach Whisper' due to its rear engines

Specifications Comparison

General Comparison

Features Comparison

  • Known For 💡
    Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraft
    Embraer E175
    • Cabin Comfort
      Embraer E175 is known for Cabin Comfort.
    • Fuel Efficiency
      Embraer E175 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
    Boeing 757-200
    • Versatility
      Boeing 757-200 is known for Versatility.
    • Reliability
      Boeing 757-200 is known for Reliability.
    McDonnell Douglas DC-9
    • Reliability
      McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is known for Reliability.

  • Pros ➕
    Key advantages and strong points of the aircraft
    Embraer E175
    • Excellent Fuel Economy
      Aircraft with superior fuel consumption efficiency and reduced operating costs
    • Low Operating Costs
    • Quiet Cabin
      Aircraft with enhanced noise reduction in passenger cabin
    Boeing 757-200
    • Excellent Range
    • Powerful Engines
      Aircraft equipped with high-thrust engines for superior performance
    • Proven Track Record
    McDonnell Douglas DC-9
    • Simple Maintenance
      Aircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures
    • Robust Design
      Aircraft built for durability and reliability
    • Quick Turnaround
      Aircraft optimized for minimal ground time between flights

  • Cons ➖
    Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraft
    Embraer E175
    • Limited Range For Longer Routes
    • Small Cargo Capacity
    Boeing 757-200
    • Aging Fleet
    • Higher Fuel Consumption
    McDonnell Douglas DC-9
Alternatives to Embraer E175
Boeing 737-900ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
⏳ is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐ is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A320-100
Known for Reliability
⏳ is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐ is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 737-300
Known for Reliability
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
⏳ is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐ is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A318
Known for Smallest A320 Family Member
⛽ is more fuel efficient than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 737-800
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
💱 is more comfortable than Boeing 757-200
🛡 is safer than Boeing 757-200
⏳ is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐ is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Boeing 767-300ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
👥 has more seats than Boeing 757-200
🌍 flies longer than Boeing 757-200
⛽ is more fuel efficient than Boeing 757-200
🚀 flies higher than Boeing 757-200
🛡 is safer than Boeing 757-200
⏳ is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐ is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A318-100
Known for Compact Size,Versatility
💱 is more comfortable than Boeing 757-200
⏳ is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐ is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A320-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 757-200
💱 is more comfortable than Boeing 757-200
🛡 is safer than Boeing 757-200
⏳ is more durable than Boeing 757-200
⭐ is better overall than Boeing 757-200
Airbus A310-300
Known for Fuel Efficiency
👥 has more seats than Boeing 757-200