Compact mode
Boeing 767-300ER vs BAe 146-200 vs Airbus A300-600
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Boeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
BAe 146-200- Only successful British commercial jet
Airbus A300-600- First twin-engine widebody
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
BAe 146-200- The Whisperjet that couldn't whisper profits
Airbus A300-600- Too old to retire too young to collect pension
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Boeing 767-300ER- Wide BodyBoeing 767-300ER is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
BAe 146-200- Regional JetBAe 146-200 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
Airbus A300-600- Wide BodyAirbus A300-600 is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 767-300ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
BAe 146-200- Regional AirlinesBAe 146-200 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- City OperationsBAe 146-200 is primarily operated by City Operations. Aircraft optimized for urban airport operations, emphasizing quick turnaround Click to see all.
Airbus A300-600- Medium-Haul PassengersAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Medium-Haul Passengers. Aircraft designed for optimal comfort on medium-length flights Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 767-300ER- Long-Haul RoutesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
BAe 146-200- Short-HaulBAe 146-200 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Urban RoutesBAe 146-200 is primarily used for Urban Routes. Aircraft optimized for city-to-city flights, emphasizing quick turnaround and efficiency Click to see all.
Airbus A300-600- Regional RoutesAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- ReliabilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
BAe 146-200- Quiet OperationBAe 146-200 is known for Quiet Operation.
- STOL CapabilityBAe 146-200 is known for STOL Capability.
Airbus A300-600- First Airbus AircraftAirbus A300-600 is known for First Airbus Aircraft.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
BAe 146-200- Low Noise Levels
- Short Runway UseAircraft suitable for limited runway length operations
Airbus A300-600- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
- Cargo Capability
- Durable
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Higher Fuel Consumption
BAe 146-200- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
- Fuel Consumption
Airbus A300-600
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 767-300ERBAe 146-200Airbus A300-600
Alternatives to Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-900ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-300
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-10
Known for Composite Materials,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
McDonnell Douglas MD-11
Known for Range,Capacity
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 747-400
Known for Queen Of The Skies,First Widebody
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 717-200
Known for Reliability
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-8
Known for Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-9
Known for Dreamliner Technology,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER