Compact mode
Boeing 767-300ER vs Boeing 737-300 vs McDonnell Douglas MD-80
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.For all*Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
Boeing 737-300- Most produced commercial jet in history
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Known as the 'Mad Dog'
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
Boeing 737-300- Has wings but still needs a runway to take off
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- The plane that thinks it's a vacuum cleaner
Commercial Comparison
Price 💰
Current market price of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Boeing 767-300ER- Wide BodyBoeing 767-300ER is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
Boeing 737-300- Narrow BodyBoeing 737-300 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Narrow BodyMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 767-300ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Boeing 737-300- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 737-300 is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Charter ServicesBoeing 737-300 is primarily operated by Charter Services.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Regional CarriersMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Domestic AirlinesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily operated by Domestic Airlines. Aircraft optimized for domestic routes, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 767-300ER- Long-Haul RoutesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Boeing 737-300- Domestic RoutesBoeing 737-300 is primarily used for Domestic Routes. Aircraft specialized for national air transportation networks Click to see all.
- Short HaulBoeing 737-300 is primarily used for Short Haul.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Short-Medium RoutesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily used for Short-Medium Routes.
- High FrequencyMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily used for High Frequency.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- ReliabilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
Boeing 737-300- ReliabilityBoeing 737-300 is known for Reliability.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Rear-Mounted EnginesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is known for Rear-Mounted Engines.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
Boeing 737-300- Proven Track Record
- Easy MaintenanceAircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components
- Versatile Operations
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Reliable Operation
- Low Acquisition CostAircraft available at competitive initial purchase prices
- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Higher Fuel Consumption
Boeing 737-300- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Higher Fuel Consumption
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Fuel Consumption
- Engine NoiseAircraft with significant engine-generated sound levels Click to see all.
- Aging Technology
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 737-300McDonnell Douglas MD-80
Alternatives to Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-900ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-10
Known for Composite Materials,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
McDonnell Douglas MD-11
Known for Range,Capacity
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 747-400
Known for Queen Of The Skies,First Widebody
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 717-200
Known for Reliability
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-9
Known for Dreamliner Technology,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 777-300ER
Known for Reliability Record
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER