Compact mode

Boeing 737-900ER vs Boeing 767-300ER

Boeing 737-900ER

Known for Reliability,Versatility

Boeing 767-300ER

Known for Reliability,Versatility

Table of content

Basic Information Comparison
Performance Comparison
Facts Comparison
Commercial Comparison

Specifications Comparison
General Comparison
Features Comparison
Ratings Comparison

Basic Information Comparison

Manufacturer 🏢

The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.

Both*

Boeing

Boeing creates diverse range of commercial and military aircraft with proven reliability
Engine Type ✈

A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.

Both*

Turbofan

Modern commercial aircraft with efficient bypass ratio engines

Performance Comparison

Maximum Range 🌍

The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.

Boeing 737-900ER

3200 nautical miles

Boeing 737-900ER can fly up to 3200 nautical miles without refueling. Click to see all.

Boeing 767-300ER

5990 nautical miles

Boeing 767-300ER can fly up to 5990 nautical miles without refueling. Click to see all.
Fuel Efficiency ⛽

Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.

Boeing 737-900ER

2.8 nautical miles per gallon

The fuel efficiency of Boeing 737-900ER is 2.8 nautical miles per gallon. Click to see all.

Boeing 767-300ER

3.4 nautical miles per gallon

The fuel efficiency of Boeing 767-300ER is 3.4 nautical miles per gallon. Click to see all.
Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽

Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.

Both*

Moderate

Aircraft with balanced fuel consumption meeting standard efficiency levels
Maximum Altitude 🚀

The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.

Boeing 737-900ER

41000 feet

The maximum operating altitude of Boeing 737-900ER is 41000 feet. Click to see all.

Boeing 767-300ER

43000 feet

The maximum operating altitude of Boeing 767-300ER is 43000 feet. Click to see all.
Maximum Altitude Type 🚀

Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.

Boeing 737-900ER

High Altitude

The Boeing 737-900ER is classified as a High Altitude altitude aircraft. High altitude aircraft operate effectively at elevated altitudes with specialized systems Click to see all.

Boeing 767-300ER

Ultra High Altitude

The Boeing 767-300ER is classified as a Ultra High Altitude altitude aircraft. Ultra high altitude aircraft operate at extreme elevations with specialized equipment Click to see all.

Facts Comparison

Interesting Fact 📖

Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraft

Boeing 737-900ER

Has the longest fuselage of any 737 variant

Boeing 767-300ER

Popular choice for cargo conversion
Sarcastic Fact 🤣

Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraft

Boeing 737-900ER

Known as the TARDIS of aviation - bigger on the inside

Boeing 767-300ER

Called the flying tank due to its durability

Commercial Comparison

Price 💰

Current market price of the aircraft

Boeing 737-900ER

101500000 USD

The price of Boeing 737-900ER is 101500000.

Boeing 767-300ER

197000000 USD

The price of Boeing 767-300ER is 197000000.

Specifications Comparison

Seating Capacity 👥

The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.

Boeing 737-900ER

189 seats

Boeing 737-900ER can accommodate 189 passengers. Click to see all.

Boeing 767-300ER

350 seats

Boeing 767-300ER can accommodate 350 passengers. Click to see all.
Seating Capacity Type ✈️

Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.

Boeing 737-900ER

Narrow Body

Boeing 737-900ER is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport

Boeing 767-300ER

Wide Body

Boeing 767-300ER is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights

General Comparison

For whom 👤

Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft type

Both*

Commercial Airlines

Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency

Boeing 737-900ER

Leisure Travelers

Boeing 737-900ER is primarily operated by Leisure Travelers. Aircraft optimized for vacation and recreational travel comfort Click to see all.

Boeing 767-300ER

Cargo Operators

Boeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯

Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfill

Boeing 737-900ER

Short To Medium Routes

Boeing 737-900ER is primarily used for Short To Medium Routes. Aircraft versatile for both short and medium-distance flights Click to see all.

High-Frequency Flights

Boeing 737-900ER is primarily used for High-Frequency Flights.

Boeing 767-300ER

Long-Haul Routes

Boeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.

Cargo Missions

Boeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Made In 🏭

Country of manufacture and primary assembly

Both*

USA

American-manufactured aircraft with proven track record

Features Comparison

Known For 💡

Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraft

Both*

Reliability

Versatility
Pros ➕

Key advantages and strong points of the aircraft

Boeing 737-900ER

Proven Track Record

Easy Maintenance

Aircraft with simplified maintenance requirements and accessible components

Good Range

Aircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations

Boeing 767-300ER

Proven Reliability

Cargo Conversion Potential

Strong Frame
Cons ➖

Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraft

Both*

Older Technology

Aircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions

Boeing 737-900ER

Limited Overhead Space

Boeing 767-300ER

Higher Fuel Consumption