Compact mode
Boeing 767-300ER vs Boeing 747-400 vs Airbus A300-600
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
Boeing 747-400- First aircraft to feature a raised upper deck hump
Airbus A300-600- First twin-engine widebody
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
Boeing 747-400- Nicknamed Jumbo but actually quite self-conscious about its size
Airbus A300-600- Too old to retire too young to collect pension
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Wide BodyWide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 767-300ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Boeing 747-400- Long-Haul TravelersBoeing 747-400 is primarily operated by Long-Haul Travelers. Aircraft equipped for maximum comfort during extended journeys Click to see all.
- Business TravelersBoeing 747-400 is primarily operated by Business Travelers. Aircraft designed with business passenger needs, offering productivity and comfort Click to see all.
Airbus A300-600- Medium-Haul PassengersAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Medium-Haul Passengers. Aircraft designed for optimal comfort on medium-length flights Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 767-300ER- Long-Haul RoutesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Boeing 747-400- Intercontinental FlightsBoeing 747-400 is primarily used for Intercontinental Flights.
- Cargo TransportBoeing 747-400 is primarily used for Cargo Transport.
Airbus A300-600- Regional RoutesAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- ReliabilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
Boeing 747-400- Queen Of The SkiesBoeing 747-400 is known for Queen Of The Skies.
- First WidebodyBoeing 747-400 is known for First Widebody.
Airbus A300-600- First Airbus AircraftAirbus A300-600 is known for First Airbus Aircraft.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
Boeing 747-400- Reliable Performance
- Spacious Cabin
- Iconic DesignAircraft with distinctive and recognizable design features Click to see all.
- Versatile Cargo Capability
Airbus A300-600- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
- Cargo Capability
- Durable
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Higher Fuel Consumption
Boeing 747-400- High Fuel ConsumptionAircraft requiring more fuel than average for operations Click to see all.
- Aging Fleet
- Maintenance CostsAircraft that require significant financial investment for maintenance and repairs Click to see all.
- Limited Modern AmenitiesAircraft lacking contemporary comfort features and technology Click to see all.
Airbus A300-600
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 767-300ERBoeing 747-400Airbus A300-600
Alternatives to Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-900ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
McDonnell Douglas MD-11
Known for Range,Capacity
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-300
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-10
Known for Composite Materials,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 717-200
Known for Reliability
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-8
Known for Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-9
Known for Dreamliner Technology,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER