Boeing 787-9 vs Boeing 767-300ER vs McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Compact mode

Boeing 787-9 vs Boeing 767-300ER vs McDonnell Douglas DC-10

Performance Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 📖

    Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraft
    Boeing 787-9
    • Uses electrochromic windows instead of physical shades
    Boeing 767-300ER
    • Popular choice for cargo conversion
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10
    • Last commercial tri-jet by McDonnell Douglas
  • Sarcastic Fact 🤣

    Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraft
    Boeing 787-9
    • So quiet inside pilots complain they can hear passenger conversations
    Boeing 767-300ER
    • Called the flying tank due to its durability
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10
    • Known as the plane that wanted three engines because it was greedy

Specifications Comparison

General Comparison

Features Comparison

  • Known For 💡

    Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraft
    Boeing 787-9
    • Dreamliner Technology
      Boeing 787-9 is known for Dreamliner Technology.
    • Passenger Comfort
      Boeing 787-9 is known for Passenger Comfort.
    Boeing 767-300ER
    • Reliability
      Boeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
    • Versatility
      Boeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10
    • Tri-Engine Design
      McDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Tri-Engine Design.
    • Cargo Conversion
      McDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Cargo Conversion.
  • Pros

    Key advantages and strong points of the aircraft
    Boeing 787-9
    • Advanced Composite Materials
    • Large Windows
    • Better Air Quality
    Boeing 767-300ER
    • Proven Reliability
    • Cargo Conversion Potential
    • Strong Frame
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10
    • Good Range
      Aircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
    • Cargo Capacity
    • Passenger Comfort
  • Cons

    Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraft
    Boeing 787-9
    • Higher Maintenance Costs
    • Complex Systems
    Boeing 767-300ER
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10

Ratings Comparison

Alternatives to Boeing 787-9
Boeing 737-900ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-10
Known for Composite Materials,Passenger Comfort
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍 flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
💱 is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡 is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-300
Known for Reliability
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
McDonnell Douglas MD-11
Known for Range,Capacity
👥 has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍 flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 747-400
Known for Queen Of The Skies,First Widebody
👥 has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍 flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
🚀 flies higher than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡 is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-8
Known for Passenger Comfort
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍 flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱 is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡 is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
👥 has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍 flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱 is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡 is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 717-200
Known for Reliability
💱 is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER