Compact mode
Boeing 767-300ER vs McDonnell Douglas DC-10 vs Ilyushin Il-96
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Last commercial tri-jet by McDonnell Douglas
Ilyushin Il-96- Only Russian widebody in production
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Known as the plane that wanted three engines because it was greedy
Ilyushin Il-96- Russians call it 'The Flying Kremlin'
Commercial Comparison
Price 💰
Current market price of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Wide BodyWide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 767-300ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Medium-Haul TravelersMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily operated by Medium-Haul Travelers. Aircraft optimized for intermediate flight distances Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Ilyushin Il-96- State OperationsIlyushin Il-96 is primarily operated by State Operations. Aircraft configured for government and official state use Click to see all.
- Long-Haul CarriersIlyushin Il-96 is primarily operated by Long-Haul Carriers. Aircraft specialized in extended-duration flight operations Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 767-300ER- Long-Haul RoutesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Transcontinental FlightsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily used for Transcontinental Flights. Aircraft designed for long distance coast-to-coast travel with efficiency and range capability Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Ilyushin Il-96- Long-Haul RoutesIlyushin Il-96 is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Government TransportIlyushin Il-96 is primarily used for Government Transport.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- ReliabilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Tri-Engine DesignMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Tri-Engine Design.
- Cargo ConversionMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Cargo Conversion.
Ilyushin Il-96- Russian EngineeringIlyushin Il-96 is known for Russian Engineering.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Cargo Capacity
- Passenger Comfort
Ilyushin Il-96- Long RangeAircraft designed for maximum flight distance capabilities
- Large Capacity
- Robust DesignAircraft built for durability and reliability
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Higher Fuel Consumption
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
- Fuel Inefficiency
- Dated Systems
Ilyushin Il-96
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96
Alternatives to Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-900ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
McDonnell Douglas MD-11
Known for Range,Capacity
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-300
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-10
Known for Composite Materials,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 747-400
Known for Queen Of The Skies,First Widebody
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 717-200
Known for Reliability
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-9
Known for Dreamliner Technology,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER