Compact mode
Boeing 767-300ER vs McDonnell Douglas MD-11 vs Airbus A300-600
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.For all*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
McDonnell Douglas MD-11- Last commercial trijet produced in US
Airbus A300-600- First twin-engine widebody
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
McDonnell Douglas MD-11- The stubborn trijet
Airbus A300-600- Too old to retire too young to collect pension
Commercial Comparison
Price 💰
Current market price of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Wide BodyWide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeFor all*Boeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 767-300ER- Long-Haul RoutesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
McDonnell Douglas MD-11- Long-HaulMcDonnell Douglas MD-11 is primarily used for Long-Haul. Aircraft designed for extended international flights Click to see all.
- Heavy FreightMcDonnell Douglas MD-11 is primarily used for Heavy Freight.
Airbus A300-600- Regional RoutesAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- ReliabilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
McDonnell Douglas MD-11- RangeMcDonnell Douglas MD-11 is known for Range.
- CapacityMcDonnell Douglas MD-11 is known for Capacity.
Airbus A300-600- First Airbus AircraftAirbus A300-600 is known for First Airbus Aircraft.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
McDonnell Douglas MD-11- Large Payload
- Versatility
Airbus A300-600- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
- Cargo Capability
- Durable
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Higher Fuel Consumption
McDonnell Douglas MD-11- High Fuel ConsumptionAircraft requiring more fuel than average for operations Click to see all.
- Complex Systems
Airbus A300-600
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 767-300ERMcDonnell Douglas MD-11Airbus A300-600
Alternatives to Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-900ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-300
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-10
Known for Composite Materials,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 747-400
Known for Queen Of The Skies,First Widebody
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
🚀
flies higher than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 717-200
Known for Reliability
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-8
Known for Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Boeing 787-9
Known for Dreamliner Technology,Passenger Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⏳
is more durable than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER
Airbus A330-300
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Boeing 767-300ER
👥
has more seats than Boeing 767-300ER
🌍
flies longer than Boeing 767-300ER
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Boeing 767-300ER
💱
is more comfortable than Boeing 767-300ER
🛡
is safer than Boeing 767-300ER
⭐
is better overall than Boeing 767-300ER