Compact mode
Embraer E175 vs McDonnell Douglas MD-80 vs Antonov An-158
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Embraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Embraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Embraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Embraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Embraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.For all*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftEmbraer E175- First flew in 2004 with reduced weight design
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Known as the 'Mad Dog'
Antonov An-158- Designed for harsh conditions
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftEmbraer E175- Known as the regional route money maker because airlines love its economics
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- The plane that thinks it's a vacuum cleaner
Antonov An-158- Soviet spirit lives on
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Embraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Embraer E175- Regional JetEmbraer E175 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Narrow BodyMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
Antonov An-158- Regional JetAntonov An-158 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeEmbraer E175- Regional TravelersEmbraer E175 is primarily operated by Regional Travelers. Aircraft suitable for frequent regional travel with enhanced comfort features Click to see all.
- Business CommutersEmbraer E175 is primarily operated by Business Commuters.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Regional CarriersMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Domestic AirlinesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily operated by Domestic Airlines. Aircraft optimized for domestic routes, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
Antonov An-158- Regional CarriersAntonov An-158 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- GovernmentAntonov An-158 is primarily operated by Government.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillEmbraer E175- Short-Haul RoutesEmbraer E175 is primarily used for Short-Haul Routes.
- Regional ConnectionsEmbraer E175 is primarily used for Regional Connections. Aircraft specialized in connecting smaller airports and communities Click to see all.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Short-Medium RoutesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily used for Short-Medium Routes.
- High FrequencyMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is primarily used for High Frequency.
Antonov An-158- Medium RoutesAntonov An-158 is primarily used for Medium Routes.
- Special MissionsAntonov An-158 is primarily used for Special Missions.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyEmbraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftEmbraer E175- Cabin ComfortEmbraer E175 is known for Cabin Comfort.
- Fuel EfficiencyEmbraer E175 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Rear-Mounted EnginesMcDonnell Douglas MD-80 is known for Rear-Mounted Engines.
Antonov An-158- Ukrainian DesignAntonov An-158 is known for Ukrainian Design.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftEmbraer E175- Excellent Fuel EconomyAircraft with superior fuel consumption efficiency and reduced operating costs
- Low Operating Costs
- Quiet CabinAircraft with enhanced noise reduction in passenger cabin
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Reliable Operation
- Low Acquisition CostAircraft available at competitive initial purchase prices
- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
Antonov An-158- Robust DesignAircraft built for durability and reliability
- High Reliability
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftEmbraer E175- Limited Range For Longer Routes
- Small Cargo Capacity
McDonnell Douglas MD-80- Fuel Consumption
- Engine NoiseAircraft with significant engine-generated sound levels Click to see all.
- Aging Technology
Antonov An-158- Political Challenges
- Limited Support
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyEmbraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesEmbraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresEmbraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingEmbraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesEmbraer E175McDonnell Douglas MD-80Antonov An-158
Alternatives to Embraer E175
Bombardier CRJ-1000
Known for High Frequency Operations
👥
has more seats than Embraer E175
Airbus A319
Known for Fuel Efficiency
👥
has more seats than Embraer E175
🌍
flies longer than Embraer E175
⏳
is more durable than Embraer E175
⭐
is better overall than Embraer E175
Embraer E170
Known for Efficiency
👥
has more seats than Embraer E175
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Embraer E175
⏳
is more durable than Embraer E175
⭐
is better overall than Embraer E175
Boeing 757-200
Known for Versatility,Reliability
👥
has more seats than Embraer E175
🌍
flies longer than Embraer E175
🚀
flies higher than Embraer E175
Airbus A318
Known for Smallest A320 Family Member
👥
has more seats than Embraer E175
🌍
flies longer than Embraer E175
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Embraer E175
Embraer E175-E2
Known for Efficiency,Modern Design
👥
has more seats than Embraer E175
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Embraer E175
💱
is more comfortable than Embraer E175
⏳
is more durable than Embraer E175
⭐
is better overall than Embraer E175
Airbus A330-900Neo
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Modern Design
👥
has more seats than Embraer E175
🌍
flies longer than Embraer E175
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Embraer E175
💱
is more comfortable than Embraer E175
⏳
is more durable than Embraer E175
⭐
is better overall than Embraer E175
Embraer E190
Known for Reliability,Versatility
👥
has more seats than Embraer E175
🌍
flies longer than Embraer E175
💱
is more comfortable than Embraer E175
⏳
is more durable than Embraer E175
⭐
is better overall than Embraer E175
Comac C919
Known for Chinese Aviation Innovation
👥
has more seats than Embraer E175
🌍
flies longer than Embraer E175
⏳
is more durable than Embraer E175