Compact mode
Airbus A300-600 vs Fokker 100 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A300-600- First twin-engine widebody
Fokker 100- Last commercial aircraft by Fokker
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Last commercial tri-jet by McDonnell Douglas
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A300-600- Too old to retire too young to collect pension
Fokker 100- Known as the 'Flying Dutchman'
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Known as the plane that wanted three engines because it was greedy
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Airbus A300-600- Wide BodyAirbus A300-600 is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
Fokker 100- Regional JetFokker 100 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Wide BodyMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A300-600- Medium-Haul PassengersAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Medium-Haul Passengers. Aircraft designed for optimal comfort on medium-length flights Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Fokker 100- Regional CarriersFokker 100 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Business AirlinesFokker 100 is primarily operated by Business Airlines.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Medium-Haul TravelersMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily operated by Medium-Haul Travelers. Aircraft optimized for intermediate flight distances Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A300-600- Regional RoutesAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Fokker 100- Regional RoutesFokker 100 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Feeder ServicesFokker 100 is primarily used for Feeder Services.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Transcontinental FlightsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily used for Transcontinental Flights. Aircraft designed for long distance coast-to-coast travel with efficiency and range capability Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A300-600- First Airbus AircraftAirbus A300-600 is known for First Airbus Aircraft.
Fokker 100- Dutch EngineeringFokker 100 is known for Dutch Engineering.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Tri-Engine DesignMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Tri-Engine Design.
- Cargo ConversionMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Cargo Conversion.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A300-600- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
- Cargo Capability
- Durable
Fokker 100- Passenger Comfort
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Low Noise
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Cargo Capacity
- Passenger Comfort
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A300-600- Dated Technology
- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
Fokker 100- Limited ProductionAircraft models produced in small quantities due to various market or manufacturing constraints Click to see all.
- Parts Availability
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
- Fuel Inefficiency
- Dated Systems
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A300-600Fokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Alternatives to Airbus A300-600
Fokker 70
Known for Dutch Engineering,Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Embraer E190-E1
Known for Efficiency,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Sukhoi Superjet 100
Known for Russian Aviation Capability
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Embraer E145
Known for Efficiency,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Mitsubishi SpaceJet M90
Known for Japanese Engineering
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
McDonnell Douglas MD-80
Known for Rear-Mounted Engines
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Antonov An-148
Known for Versatility
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
Embraer E195
Known for Passenger Comfort,Economics
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Airbus A310-300
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
🌍
flies longer than Fokker 100
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Bombardier CRJ-700
Known for Operational Flexibility
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100