Compact mode
Boeing 767-300ER vs Fokker 100 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Boeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Boeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Boeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Boeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Boeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Boeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Popular choice for cargo conversion
Fokker 100- Last commercial aircraft by Fokker
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Last commercial tri-jet by McDonnell Douglas
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Called the flying tank due to its durability
Fokker 100- Known as the 'Flying Dutchman'
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Known as the plane that wanted three engines because it was greedy
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Boeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Boeing 767-300ER- Wide BodyBoeing 767-300ER is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
Fokker 100- Regional JetFokker 100 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Wide BodyMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is classified as a Wide Body aircraft. Wide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBoeing 767-300ER- Commercial AirlinesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Commercial Airlines. Aircraft optimized for commercial passenger operations, balancing capacity and efficiency Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Fokker 100- Regional CarriersFokker 100 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Business AirlinesFokker 100 is primarily operated by Business Airlines.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Medium-Haul TravelersMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily operated by Medium-Haul Travelers. Aircraft optimized for intermediate flight distances Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBoeing 767-300ER- Long-Haul RoutesBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsBoeing 767-300ER is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Fokker 100- Regional RoutesFokker 100 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Feeder ServicesFokker 100 is primarily used for Feeder Services.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Transcontinental FlightsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily used for Transcontinental Flights. Aircraft designed for long distance coast-to-coast travel with efficiency and range capability Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyBoeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- ReliabilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Reliability.
- VersatilityBoeing 767-300ER is known for Versatility.
Fokker 100- Dutch EngineeringFokker 100 is known for Dutch Engineering.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Tri-Engine DesignMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Tri-Engine Design.
- Cargo ConversionMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Cargo Conversion.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Proven Reliability
- Cargo Conversion Potential
- Strong Frame
Fokker 100- Passenger Comfort
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Low Noise
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Cargo Capacity
- Passenger Comfort
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoeing 767-300ER- Older TechnologyAircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.
- Higher Fuel Consumption
Fokker 100- Limited ProductionAircraft models produced in small quantities due to various market or manufacturing constraints Click to see all.
- Parts Availability
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
- Fuel Inefficiency
- Dated Systems
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBoeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBoeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBoeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingBoeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesBoeing 767-300ERFokker 100McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Alternatives to Boeing 767-300ER
Fokker 70
Known for Dutch Engineering,Comfort
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Embraer E190-E1
Known for Efficiency,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Sukhoi Superjet 100
Known for Russian Aviation Capability
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Embraer E145
Known for Efficiency,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Mitsubishi SpaceJet M90
Known for Japanese Engineering
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
McDonnell Douglas MD-80
Known for Rear-Mounted Engines
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Boeing 707-320B
Known for First Successful Commercial Jet
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
🌍
flies longer than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
Embraer E195
Known for Passenger Comfort,Economics
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Embraer E190
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
⛽
is more fuel efficient than Fokker 100
🚀
flies higher than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100
Airbus A300-600
Known for First Airbus Aircraft
🔧
is more reliable than Fokker 100
👥
has more seats than Fokker 100
🌍
flies longer than Fokker 100
💱
is more comfortable than Fokker 100
🛡
is safer than Fokker 100
⏳
is more durable than Fokker 100
⭐
is better overall than Fokker 100