Compact mode
Airbus A300-600 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-10 vs Ilyushin Il-96
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.For all*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A300-600- First twin-engine widebody
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Last commercial tri-jet by McDonnell Douglas
Ilyushin Il-96- Only Russian widebody in production
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A300-600- Too old to retire too young to collect pension
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Known as the plane that wanted three engines because it was greedy
Ilyushin Il-96- Russians call it 'The Flying Kremlin'
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.For all*- Wide BodyWide body aircraft feature twin aisles and spacious cabins, typically seating 200-400 passengers for medium to long-haul flights
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A300-600- Medium-Haul PassengersAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Medium-Haul Passengers. Aircraft designed for optimal comfort on medium-length flights Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsAirbus A300-600 is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Medium-Haul TravelersMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily operated by Medium-Haul Travelers. Aircraft optimized for intermediate flight distances Click to see all.
- Cargo OperatorsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily operated by Cargo Operators. Aircraft optimized for freight operations, featuring enhanced cargo capacity Click to see all.
Ilyushin Il-96- State OperationsIlyushin Il-96 is primarily operated by State Operations. Aircraft configured for government and official state use Click to see all.
- Long-Haul CarriersIlyushin Il-96 is primarily operated by Long-Haul Carriers. Aircraft specialized in extended-duration flight operations Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A300-600- Regional RoutesAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsAirbus A300-600 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Transcontinental FlightsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily used for Transcontinental Flights. Aircraft designed for long distance coast-to-coast travel with efficiency and range capability Click to see all.
- Cargo MissionsMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is primarily used for Cargo Missions. Specialized aircraft designed for efficient cargo transport operations Click to see all.
Ilyushin Il-96- Long-Haul RoutesIlyushin Il-96 is primarily used for Long-Haul Routes. Aircraft specialized for extended international route operations Click to see all.
- Government TransportIlyushin Il-96 is primarily used for Government Transport.
Made In 🏭
Country of manufacture and primary assemblyAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftAirbus A300-600- First Airbus AircraftAirbus A300-600 is known for First Airbus Aircraft.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Tri-Engine DesignMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Tri-Engine Design.
- Cargo ConversionMcDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Cargo Conversion.
Ilyushin Il-96- Russian EngineeringIlyushin Il-96 is known for Russian Engineering.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A300-600- Proven DesignAircraft with established reliability and performance record
- Cargo Capability
- Durable
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Cargo Capacity
- Passenger Comfort
Ilyushin Il-96- Long RangeAircraft designed for maximum flight distance capabilities
- Large Capacity
- Robust DesignAircraft built for durability and reliability
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftAirbus A300-600- Dated Technology
- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
McDonnell Douglas DC-10- High MaintenanceAircraft requiring frequent maintenance and service intervals Click to see all.
- Fuel Inefficiency
- Dated Systems
Ilyushin Il-96
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Buy It For Life ⏳
Long-term value and durability ratingAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96Score ⭐
Overall rating combining all scoring attributesAirbus A300-600McDonnell Douglas DC-10Ilyushin Il-96
Alternatives to Airbus A300-600
Lockheed L-1011
Known for Advanced Automation,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
👥
has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⛽
is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
💱
is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
BAe 146
Known for Quiet Operation
⛽
is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
COMAC ARJ21
Known for Chinese Aviation Entry
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Boeing 767-300ER
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⛽
is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🚀
flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
💱
is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
McDonnell Douglas MD-11
Known for Range,Capacity
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
👥
has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🌍
flies longer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🚀
flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
💱
is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Boeing 777F
Known for Cargo Capacity,Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🚀
flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
💱
is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Fokker 100
Known for Dutch Engineering
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⛽
is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
💱
is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Boeing 747-8
Known for Queen Of The Skies
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
👥
has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🌍
flies longer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⛽
is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🚀
flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
💱
is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Boeing 777-200ER
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
👥
has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🌍
flies longer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⛽
is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🚀
flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
💱
is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-10
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-10