Compact mode

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 vs Fokker 100 vs Antonov An-148

Table of content

Basic Information Comparison
Performance Comparison
Facts Comparison
Commercial Comparison

Specifications Comparison
General Comparison
Features Comparison
Ratings Comparison

Basic Information Comparison

Manufacturer 🏢

The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Boeing

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is manufactured by Boeing. Boeing creates diverse range of commercial and military aircraft with proven reliability Click to see all.

Fokker 100

Fokker

Fokker 100 is manufactured by Fokker. Fokker historically produced commercial aircraft known for reliability Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

Antonov

Antonov An-148 is manufactured by Antonov. Antonov specializes in large cargo aircraft and specialized transport planes Click to see all.
Engine Type ✈

A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.

For all*

Turbofan

Modern commercial aircraft with efficient bypass ratio engines

Performance Comparison

Maximum Range 🌍

The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

2400 nautical miles

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 can fly up to 2400 nautical miles without refueling. Click to see all.

Fokker 100

3000 nautical miles

Fokker 100 can fly up to 3000 nautical miles without refueling. Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

2100 nautical miles

Antonov An-148 can fly up to 2100 nautical miles without refueling. Click to see all.
Fuel Efficiency ⛽

Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

2 nautical miles per gallon

The fuel efficiency of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is 2 nautical miles per gallon. Click to see all.

Fokker 100

2.5 nautical miles per gallon

The fuel efficiency of Fokker 100 is 2.5 nautical miles per gallon. Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

2.1 nautical miles per gallon

The fuel efficiency of Antonov An-148 is 2.1 nautical miles per gallon. Click to see all.
Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽

Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Below Average

The McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is classified as Below Average in terms of fuel efficiency. Aircraft with fuel consumption rates higher than industry standards Click to see all.

Fokker 100

Moderate

The Fokker 100 is classified as Moderate in terms of fuel efficiency. Aircraft with balanced fuel consumption meeting standard efficiency levels Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

Below Average

The Antonov An-148 is classified as Below Average in terms of fuel efficiency. Aircraft with fuel consumption rates higher than industry standards Click to see all.
Maximum Altitude 🚀

The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

37000 feet

The maximum operating altitude of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is 37000 feet. Click to see all.

Fokker 100

35000 feet

The maximum operating altitude of Fokker 100 is 35000 feet. Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

40000 feet

The maximum operating altitude of Antonov An-148 is 40000 feet. Click to see all.
Maximum Altitude Type 🚀

Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.

For all*

High Altitude

High altitude aircraft operate effectively at elevated altitudes with specialized systems

Facts Comparison

Interesting Fact 📖

Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraft

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Can operate from short runways

Fokker 100

Last commercial aircraft by Fokker

Antonov An-148

Can operate in -50°C temperatures
Sarcastic Fact 🤣

Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraft

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Called the 'Beach Whisper' due to its rear engines

Fokker 100

Known as the 'Flying Dutchman'

Antonov An-148

Known as 'The Ukrainian Express'

Commercial Comparison

Price 💰

Current market price of the aircraft

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

45000000 USD

The price of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is 45000000.

Fokker 100

41000000 USD

The price of Fokker 100 is 41000000.

Antonov An-148

35000000 USD

The price of Antonov An-148 is 35000000.

Specifications Comparison

Seating Capacity 👥

The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

135 seats

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 can accommodate 135 passengers. Click to see all.

Fokker 100

109 seats

Fokker 100 can accommodate 109 passengers. Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

85 seats

Antonov An-148 can accommodate 85 passengers. Click to see all.
Seating Capacity Type ✈️

Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Narrow Body

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is classified as a Narrow Body aircraft. Single-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport

Fokker 100

Regional Jet

Fokker 100 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes

Antonov An-148

Regional Jet

Antonov An-148 is classified as a Regional Jet aircraft. Regional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes

General Comparison

For whom 👤

Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft type

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Regional Airlines

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.

Charter Services

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is primarily operated by Charter Services.

Fokker 100

Regional Carriers

Fokker 100 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.

Business Airlines

Fokker 100 is primarily operated by Business Airlines.

Antonov An-148

Regional Airlines

Antonov An-148 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.

Government Use

Antonov An-148 is primarily operated by Government Use. Aircraft configured for official government transportation and operations Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯

Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfill

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Short-Haul Operations

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is primarily used for Short-Haul Operations.

Quick Turnaround

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is primarily used for Quick Turnaround. Aircraft designed for rapid ground handling and maintenance Click to see all.

Fokker 100

Regional Routes

Fokker 100 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.

Feeder Services

Fokker 100 is primarily used for Feeder Services.

Antonov An-148

Regional Routes

Antonov An-148 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.

Harsh Conditions

Antonov An-148 is primarily used for Harsh Conditions. Aircraft capable of operating in challenging environments Click to see all.
Made In 🏭

Country of manufacture and primary assembly

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

USA

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is manufactured in USA. American-manufactured aircraft with proven track record Click to see all.

Fokker 100

Netherlands

Fokker 100 is manufactured in Netherlands. Dutch-manufactured aircraft known for innovative design Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

Ukraine

Antonov An-148 is manufactured in Ukraine. Ukrainian-built aircraft emphasizing cargo capabilities Click to see all.

Features Comparison

Known For 💡

Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraft

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Reliability

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is known for Reliability.

Fokker 100

Dutch Engineering

Fokker 100 is known for Dutch Engineering.

Antonov An-148

Versatility

Antonov An-148 is known for Versatility.
Pros ➕

Key advantages and strong points of the aircraft

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Simple Maintenance

Aircraft designed for easy maintenance procedures

Robust Design

Aircraft built for durability and reliability

Quick Turnaround

Aircraft optimized for minimal ground time between flights

Fokker 100

Passenger Comfort

Good Range

Aircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations

Low Noise

Antonov An-148

High Speed

Aircraft capable of achieving and maintaining high cruise speeds

Short Field Capability

Aircraft capable of operating from shorter runways

Cold Weather Operations

Aircraft designed to operate efficiently in low temperature conditions
Cons ➖

Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraft

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Limited Range

Aircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations Click to see all.

Older Technology

Aircraft utilizing less advanced or outdated technological solutions Click to see all.

Fokker 100

Limited Production

Aircraft models produced in small quantities due to various market or manufacturing constraints Click to see all.

Parts Availability

Antonov An-148

Limited Production

Aircraft models produced in small quantities due to various market or manufacturing constraints Click to see all.

Western Integration

Discusses challenges and limitations when integrating Western aircraft systems and standards Click to see all.

Ratings Comparison

Reliability Score 🔧

Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational history

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

7.9

The reliability score of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is 7.9. Click to see all.

Fokker 100

7.5

The reliability score of Fokker 100 is 7.5. Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

6.5

The reliability score of Antonov An-148 is 6.5. Click to see all.
Comfort Score 💱

Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenities

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

6.8

The comfort score of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is 6.8. Click to see all.

Fokker 100

7.2

The comfort score of Fokker 100 is 7.2. Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

6.2

The comfort score of Antonov An-148 is 6.2. Click to see all.
Safety Score 🛡

Safety rating based on accident history and safety features

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

8.2

The safety score of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is 8.2. Click to see all.

Fokker 100

8

The safety score of Fokker 100 is 8. Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

7.5

The safety score of Antonov An-148 is 7.5. Click to see all.
Buy It For Life ⏳

Long-term value and durability rating

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

7.5

The Buy It For Life score of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is 7.5. Click to see all.

Fokker 100

6.8

The Buy It For Life score of Fokker 100 is 6.8. Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

6

The Buy It For Life score of Antonov An-148 is 6. Click to see all.
Score ⭐

Overall rating combining all scoring attributes

McDonnell Douglas DC-9

7.6

The overall score of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 is 7.6. Click to see all.

Fokker 100

7.4

The overall score of Fokker 100 is 7.4. Click to see all.

Antonov An-148

6.6

The overall score of Antonov An-148 is 6.6. Click to see all.

Alternatives to McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Boeing 737-300

Known for Reliability

🔧 is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

👥 has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

💱 is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Boeing 757-200

Known for Versatility,Reliability

🔧 is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

👥 has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🌍 flies longer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🚀 flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

💱 is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Boeing 737-700

Known for Reliability,Versatility

🔧 is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

👥 has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🌍 flies longer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🚀 flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

💱 is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⏳ is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Boeing 717-200

Known for Reliability

🔧 is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

💱 is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⏳ is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

McDonnell Douglas MD-80

Known for Rear-Mounted Engines

👥 has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

💱 is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Boeing 737-200

Known for Durability

🌍 flies longer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⏳ is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Boeing 737-800

Known for Reliability,Versatility

🔧 is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

👥 has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🌍 flies longer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🚀 flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

💱 is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⏳ is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Boeing 737-900ER

Known for Reliability,Versatility

🔧 is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

👥 has more seats than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🌍 flies longer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🚀 flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

💱 is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⏳ is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Bombardier CRJ-100

Known for Regional Efficiency

🔧 is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⏳ is more durable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

Airbus A318

Known for Smallest A320 Family Member

🔧 is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🌍 flies longer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⛽ is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🚀 flies higher than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

💱 is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

🛡 is safer than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

⭐ is better overall than McDonnell Douglas DC-9

McDonnell Douglas DC-9 vs Fokker 100 vs Antonov An-148

Table of content

Basic Information Comparison

Manufacturer 🏢

Engine Type ✈

Performance Comparison

Maximum Range 🌍

Fuel Efficiency ⛽

Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽

Maximum Altitude 🚀

Maximum Altitude Type 🚀

Facts Comparison

Interesting Fact 📖

Sarcastic Fact 🤣

Commercial Comparison

Price 💰

Specifications Comparison

Seating Capacity 👥

Seating Capacity Type ✈️

General Comparison

For whom 👤

Purpose 🎯

Made In 🏭

Features Comparison

Known For 💡

Pros ➕

Cons ➖

Ratings Comparison

Reliability Score 🔧

Comfort Score 💱

Safety Score 🛡

Buy It For Life ⏳

Score ⭐