Compact mode
Airbus A310-300 vs McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Both*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftAirbus A310-300- First Airbus with Two-Crew Digital Cockpit
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Last MD series aircraft
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Looks like a shrunk A300 that went through the wash
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- The plane that tried to keep MD relevant
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Airbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Both*- Narrow BodySingle-aisle aircraft designed for efficient passenger transport
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeAirbus A310-300- Regional CarriersAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- Mid-Size AirlinesAirbus A310-300 is primarily operated by Mid-Size Airlines.
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Domestic TravelersMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily operated by Domestic Travelers.
- Regional AirlinesMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillAirbus A310-300- Medium-Haul RoutesAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Routes. Aircraft optimized for routes between major regional destinations Click to see all.
- Cargo OperationsAirbus A310-300 is primarily used for Cargo Operations.
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Medium-Haul FlightsMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily used for Medium-Haul Flights. Aircraft designed for optimal performance on 3-6 hour flights Click to see all.
- Domestic RoutesMcDonnell Douglas MD-90 is primarily used for Domestic Routes. Aircraft specialized for national air transportation networks Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftAirbus A310-300- Versatile DesignAircraft adaptable to various operational requirements
- Good RangeAircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
- Reliable Operations
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Reliable Performance
- Good Economics
- Low Noise
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoth*Airbus A310-300- Aging Fleet
- Higher Maintenance Costs
McDonnell Douglas MD-90- Parts Availability
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyAirbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesAirbus A310-300McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Alternatives to Airbus A310-300
Boeing 737-300
Known for Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Fokker 70
Known for Dutch Engineering,Comfort
💱
is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
BAe 146-200
Known for Quiet Operation,STOL Capability
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
McDonnell Douglas MD-80
Known for Rear-Mounted Engines
👥
has more seats than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Bombardier CRJ-900
Known for Reliability,Cost Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
⛽
is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
🚀
flies higher than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Boeing 737-700
Known for Reliability,Versatility
🔧
is more reliable than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
🌍
flies longer than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
⛽
is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
🚀
flies higher than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
💱
is more comfortable than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
🛡
is safer than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
⭐
is better overall than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Boeing 737-200
Known for Durability
🌍
flies longer than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
⏳
is more durable than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Fokker 100
Known for Dutch Engineering
🌍
flies longer than McDonnell Douglas MD-90
⛽
is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas MD-90