Similar and Alternative Airplanes to BAe 146
Categories- Manufacturer 🏢BAeSeating Capacity 👥112 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Noise Levels & Short Runway UseCons ➖High Maintenance & Fuel Consumption🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146🛡 is safer than BAe 146⏳ is more durable than BAe 146⭐ is better overall than BAe 146
- Manufacturer 🏢COMACSeating Capacity 👥90 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.6 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Acquisition Cost & Domestic SupportCons ➖Limited International Presence & Newer Technology🌍 flies longer than BAe 146🚀 flies higher than BAe 146
- Manufacturer 🏢McDonnell DouglasSeating Capacity 👥380 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Good Range, Cargo Capacity and Passenger ComfortCons ➖High Maintenance, Fuel Inefficiency and Dated Systems👥 has more seats than BAe 146🌍 flies longer than BAe 146🚀 flies higher than BAe 146
- Manufacturer 🏢DornierSeating Capacity 👥32 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.4 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Short Runway Capability & Quick TurnaroundCons ➖Limited Capacity & Production Ended🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146🚀 flies higher than BAe 146💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146🛡 is safer than BAe 146⏳ is more durable than BAe 146⭐ is better overall than BAe 146
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥266 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.5 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Proven Design, Cargo Capability and DurableCons ➖Dated Technology & High Maintenance🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146👥 has more seats than BAe 146🌍 flies longer than BAe 146⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146🚀 flies higher than BAe 146💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146⏳ is more durable than BAe 146⭐ is better overall than BAe 146
- Manufacturer 🏢EmbraerSeating Capacity 👥37 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.8 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Economic Operation & Easy MaintenanceCons ➖Limited Passenger Space & Range Restrictions🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146🚀 flies higher than BAe 146🛡 is safer than BAe 146⏳ is more durable than BAe 146⭐ is better overall than BAe 146
- Manufacturer 🏢FokkerSeating Capacity 👥79 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.4 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Passenger Comfort & PerformanceCons ➖Limited Production & Parts Availability🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146🚀 flies higher than BAe 146💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146🛡 is safer than BAe 146⏳ is more durable than BAe 146⭐ is better overall than BAe 146
- Manufacturer 🏢SukhoiSeating Capacity 👥108 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.5 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Competitive Price, Modern Cockpit and Good PerformanceCons ➖Limited Global Support & Political Concerns🌍 flies longer than BAe 146⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146🚀 flies higher than BAe 146💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146⏳ is more durable than BAe 146⭐ is better overall than BAe 146
- Manufacturer 🏢BombardierSeating Capacity 👥50 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.8 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Cost Effective, Quick Boarding and Efficient OperationsCons ➖Small Cabin & Limited Baggage Space🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146🚀 flies higher than BAe 146🛡 is safer than BAe 146⏳ is more durable than BAe 146⭐ is better overall than BAe 146
- Manufacturer 🏢EmbraerSeating Capacity 👥114 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.5 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs, Passenger Comfort and Quick TurnaroundCons ➖Limited Range & Small Cargo Hold🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146👥 has more seats than BAe 146🌍 flies longer than BAe 146⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146🚀 flies higher than BAe 146💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146🛡 is safer than BAe 146⏳ is more durable than BAe 146⭐ is better overall than BAe 146
- BAe 146-200 is manufactured by BAe. BAe 146-200 can accommodate 112 passengers. 👉 BAe 146 has same number of seats as BAe 146-200. The BAe 146-200 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of BAe 146-200 is 2.2 nautical miles per gallon. 👎 BAe 146 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200. The price of BAe 146-200 is 40000000. 👍 BAe 146-200 is cheaper than BAe 146.
- COMAC ARJ21 is manufactured by COMAC. 👍 undefined. COMAC ARJ21 can accommodate 90 passengers. 👎 BAe 146 has more seats than COMAC ARJ21. The COMAC ARJ21 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of COMAC ARJ21 is 1.6 nautical miles per gallon. 👎 BAe 146 is more fuel efficient than COMAC ARJ21. The price of COMAC ARJ21 is 38000000. 👉 BAe 146 costs same as COMAC ARJ21.
- McDonnell Douglas DC-10 is manufactured by McDonnell Douglas. 👍 undefined. McDonnell Douglas DC-10 can accommodate 380 passengers. 👍 McDonnell Douglas DC-10 has more seats than BAe 146. The McDonnell Douglas DC-10 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of McDonnell Douglas DC-10 is 1.8 nautical miles per gallon. 👎 BAe 146 is more fuel efficient than McDonnell Douglas DC-10. The price of McDonnell Douglas DC-10 is 165000000. 👍 McDonnell Douglas DC-10 is cheaper than BAe 146.
- Dornier 328JET is manufactured by Dornier. 👍 undefined. Dornier 328JET can accommodate 32 passengers. 👎 BAe 146 has more seats than Dornier 328JET. The Dornier 328JET is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Dornier 328JET is 1.4 nautical miles per gallon. 👎 BAe 146 is more fuel efficient than Dornier 328JET. The price of Dornier 328JET is 28000000. 👎 BAe 146 is cheaper than Dornier 328JET.
- Airbus A300-600 is manufactured by Airbus. Airbus A300-600 can accommodate 266 passengers. 👍 Airbus A300-600 has more seats than BAe 146. The Airbus A300-600 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Airbus A300-600 is 2.5 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Airbus A300-600 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146. The price of Airbus A300-600 is 185000000. 👍 Airbus A300-600 is cheaper than BAe 146.
- Embraer ERJ-135 is manufactured by Embraer. 👍 undefined. Embraer ERJ-135 can accommodate 37 passengers. 👎 BAe 146 has more seats than Embraer ERJ-135. The Embraer ERJ-135 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Embraer ERJ-135 is 2.8 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Embraer ERJ-135 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146. The price of Embraer ERJ-135 is 25000000. 👎 BAe 146 is cheaper than Embraer ERJ-135.
- Fokker 70 is manufactured by Fokker. 👍 undefined. Fokker 70 can accommodate 79 passengers. 👎 BAe 146 has more seats than Fokker 70. The Fokker 70 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Fokker 70 is 2.4 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Fokker 70 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146. The price of Fokker 70 is 30000000. 👎 BAe 146 is cheaper than Fokker 70.
- Sukhoi Superjet 100 is manufactured by Sukhoi. 👍 undefined. Sukhoi Superjet 100 can accommodate 108 passengers. 👎 BAe 146 has more seats than Sukhoi Superjet 100. The Sukhoi Superjet 100 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Sukhoi Superjet 100 is 2.5 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Sukhoi Superjet 100 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146. The price of Sukhoi Superjet 100 is 35000000. 👎 BAe 146 is cheaper than Sukhoi Superjet 100.
- Bombardier CRJ-200 is manufactured by Bombardier. Bombardier CRJ-200 can accommodate 50 passengers. 👎 BAe 146 has more seats than Bombardier CRJ-200. The Bombardier CRJ-200 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Bombardier CRJ-200 is 1.8 nautical miles per gallon. 👎 BAe 146 is more fuel efficient than Bombardier CRJ-200. The price of Bombardier CRJ-200 is 30000000. 👎 BAe 146 is cheaper than Bombardier CRJ-200.
- Embraer E190-E1 is manufactured by Embraer. 👍 undefined. Embraer E190-E1 can accommodate 114 passengers. 👍 Embraer E190-E1 has more seats than BAe 146. The Embraer E190-E1 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Embraer E190-E1 is 2.5 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Embraer E190-E1 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146. The price of Embraer E190-E1 is 52000000. 👍 Embraer E190-E1 is cheaper than BAe 146.