Similar and Alternative Airplanes to BAe 146-200
Categories- Manufacturer 🏢British AerospaceSeating Capacity 👥112 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.3 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Quiet Operations, Short Field Performance and High Wing DesignCons ➖High Maintenance & Fuel Consumption🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
- Manufacturer 🏢BombardierSeating Capacity 👥90 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.7 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Proven Platform, Good Economics and Easy Crew TransitionCons ➖Limited Overhead Space & Lower Range🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
- Manufacturer 🏢DornierSeating Capacity 👥32 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽1.4 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Short Runway Capability & Quick TurnaroundCons ➖Limited Capacity & Production Ended🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥153 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.4 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Reliable Performance, Good Economics and Low NoiseCons ➖Limited Production & Parts Availability🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146-200
- Manufacturer 🏢ATRSeating Capacity 👥48 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbopropFuel Efficiency ⛽3.2 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Low Operating Costs, Short Runway Capability, Robust Design, Fuel Efficient and Short Runway CapableCons ➖Limited Speed, Weather Sensitivity, Limited Range and Speed Restrictions⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥266 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.5 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Proven Design, Cargo Capability and DurableCons ➖Dated Technology & High Maintenance👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
- Manufacturer 🏢BombardierSeating Capacity 👥50 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.1 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Low Operating Cost, Quick Turnaround and ReliableCons ➖Limited Cabin Space & Limited Range🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200🛡 is safer than BAe 146-200
- Manufacturer 🏢BoeingSeating Capacity 👥130 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.2 nautical miles per gallonPros ➕Proven Design, Low Operating Cost and Simple SystemsCons ➖Noisy & Higher Fuel Consumption👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
- Manufacturer 🏢AirbusSeating Capacity 👥220 seats 🟢Engine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.8 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Versatile Design, Good Range and Reliable OperationsCons ➖Limited Production, Aging Fleet and Higher Maintenance Costs👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
- Manufacturer 🏢BombardierSeating Capacity 👥50 seatsEngine Type ✈TurbofanFuel Efficiency ⛽2.9 nautical miles per gallon 🟢Pros ➕Premium Cabin Layout & Efficient OperationsCons ➖Limited Passenger Capacity & Cargo Space⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146-200🛡 is safer than BAe 146-200⏳ is more durable than BAe 146-200⭐ is better overall than BAe 146-200
- BAe 146 is manufactured by British Aerospace. 👍 undefined. BAe 146 can accommodate 112 passengers. 👉 BAe 146-200 has same number of seats as BAe 146. The BAe 146 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of BAe 146 is 2.3 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 BAe 146 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200. The price of BAe 146 is 38000000. 👎 BAe 146-200 is cheaper than BAe 146.
- Bombardier CRJ-900 is manufactured by Bombardier. 👍 undefined. Bombardier CRJ-900 can accommodate 90 passengers. 👎 BAe 146-200 has more seats than Bombardier CRJ-900. The Bombardier CRJ-900 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Bombardier CRJ-900 is 2.7 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Bombardier CRJ-900 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200. The price of Bombardier CRJ-900 is 45000000. 👍 Bombardier CRJ-900 is cheaper than BAe 146-200.
- Dornier 328JET is manufactured by Dornier. 👍 undefined. Dornier 328JET can accommodate 32 passengers. 👎 BAe 146-200 has more seats than Dornier 328JET. The Dornier 328JET is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Dornier 328JET is 1.4 nautical miles per gallon. 👎 BAe 146-200 is more fuel efficient than Dornier 328JET. The price of Dornier 328JET is 28000000. 👎 BAe 146-200 is cheaper than Dornier 328JET.
- McDonnell Douglas MD-90 is manufactured by Boeing. 👍 undefined. McDonnell Douglas MD-90 can accommodate 153 passengers. 👍 McDonnell Douglas MD-90 has more seats than BAe 146-200. The McDonnell Douglas MD-90 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of McDonnell Douglas MD-90 is 2.4 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 McDonnell Douglas MD-90 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200. The price of McDonnell Douglas MD-90 is 149000000. 👍 McDonnell Douglas MD-90 is cheaper than BAe 146-200.
- ATR 42-600 is manufactured by ATR. ATR 42-600 can accommodate 48 passengers. 👎 BAe 146-200 has more seats than ATR 42-600. The ATR 42-600 is equipped with Turboprop. 👍 undefined. The fuel efficiency of ATR 42-600 is 3.2 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 ATR 42-600 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200. The price of ATR 42-600 is 20000000. 👎 BAe 146-200 is cheaper than ATR 42-600.
- Airbus A300-600 is manufactured by Airbus. Airbus A300-600 can accommodate 266 passengers. 👍 Airbus A300-600 has more seats than BAe 146-200. The Airbus A300-600 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Airbus A300-600 is 2.5 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Airbus A300-600 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200. The price of Airbus A300-600 is 185000000. 👍 Airbus A300-600 is cheaper than BAe 146-200.
- Bombardier CRJ-100 is manufactured by Bombardier. 👍 undefined. Bombardier CRJ-100 can accommodate 50 passengers. 👎 BAe 146-200 has more seats than Bombardier CRJ-100. The Bombardier CRJ-100 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Bombardier CRJ-100 is 2.1 nautical miles per gallon. 👎 BAe 146-200 is more fuel efficient than Bombardier CRJ-100. The price of Bombardier CRJ-100 is 120000000. 👍 Bombardier CRJ-100 is cheaper than BAe 146-200.
- Boeing 737-200 is manufactured by Boeing. 👍 undefined. Boeing 737-200 can accommodate 130 passengers. 👍 Boeing 737-200 has more seats than BAe 146-200. The Boeing 737-200 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Boeing 737-200 is 2.2 nautical miles per gallon. 👉 BAe 146-200 has same fuel efficiency as Boeing 737-200. The price of Boeing 737-200 is 68000000. 👍 Boeing 737-200 is cheaper than BAe 146-200.
- Airbus A310-300 is manufactured by Airbus. Airbus A310-300 can accommodate 220 passengers. 👍 Airbus A310-300 has more seats than BAe 146-200. The Airbus A310-300 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Airbus A310-300 is 2.8 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Airbus A310-300 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200. The price of Airbus A310-300 is 82000000. 👍 Airbus A310-300 is cheaper than BAe 146-200.
- Bombardier CRJ-550 is manufactured by Bombardier. 👍 undefined. Bombardier CRJ-550 can accommodate 50 passengers. 👎 BAe 146-200 has more seats than Bombardier CRJ-550. The Bombardier CRJ-550 is equipped with Turbofan. 👉 undefined. The fuel efficiency of Bombardier CRJ-550 is 2.9 nautical miles per gallon. 👍 Bombardier CRJ-550 is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200. The price of Bombardier CRJ-550 is 45000000. 👍 Bombardier CRJ-550 is cheaper than BAe 146-200.