Exponential Moving Average (EMA) vs Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Slow Stochastic
Compact mode

Exponential Moving Average (EMA) vs Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Slow Stochastic

General Information Comparison

Characteristics Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 💡

    An intriguing or lesser-known fact about the trading indicator
    Exponential Moving Average (EMA)
    • Used in the popular MACD indicator
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Developed by Alan Hull to address the lag in traditional moving averages
    Slow Stochastic
    • Developed by George Lane in the 1950s
  • Sarcastic Fact 😉

    A humorous or ironic observation about the trading indicator
    Exponential Moving Average (EMA)
    • Even a snail moves faster than an EMA in a sideways market
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Humorously called the 'moving average on steroids' by some traders
    Slow Stochastic
    • Sometimes called the "snail" of indicators due to its slow-moving nature

Application Comparison

  • Timeframe 🕑

    The time intervals or periods for which the trading indicator is most effective or commonly used.
    Exponential Moving Average (EMA)
    • Daily
      Exponential Moving Average (EMA) is most effective for Daily timeframes. Indicators optimized for daily chart analysis, suitable for swing and position traders.
    • Weekly
      Exponential Moving Average (EMA) is most effective for Weekly timeframes. Indicators optimized for weekly chart analysis, balancing short-term noise and long-term trends.
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Any
      Hull Moving Average (HMA) is most effective for Any timeframes. Flexible indicators adaptable to various trading timeframes, offering versatility in analysis.
    Slow Stochastic
    • Daily
      Slow Stochastic is most effective for Daily timeframes. Indicators optimized for daily chart analysis, suitable for swing and position traders.

Technical Details Comparison

Evaluation Comparison

Performance Metrics Comparison