Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Ichimoku Cloud vs Guppy Multiple Moving Average
Compact mode

Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Ichimoku Cloud vs Guppy Multiple Moving Average

General Information Comparison

Characteristics Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 💡

    An intriguing or lesser-known fact about the trading indicator
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Developed by Alan Hull to address the lag in traditional moving averages
    Ichimoku Cloud
    • Created by Japanese journalist Goichi Hosoda
    Guppy Multiple Moving Average
    • Developed by Australian trader Daryl Guppy
  • Sarcastic Fact 😉

    A humorous or ironic observation about the trading indicator
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Humorously called the 'moving average on steroids' by some traders
    Ichimoku Cloud
    • It's like a weather forecast for your trades - often wrong but never in doubt
    Guppy Multiple Moving Average
    • Sometimes looks like a colorful spaghetti mess on the chart

Application Comparison

  • Timeframe 🕑

    The time intervals or periods for which the trading indicator is most effective or commonly used.
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Any
      Hull Moving Average (HMA) is most effective for Any timeframes. Flexible indicators adaptable to various trading timeframes, offering versatility in analysis.
    Ichimoku Cloud
    • Daily
      Ichimoku Cloud is most effective for Daily timeframes. Indicators optimized for daily chart analysis, suitable for swing and position traders.
    • Weekly
      Ichimoku Cloud is most effective for Weekly timeframes. Indicators optimized for weekly chart analysis, balancing short-term noise and long-term trends.
    Guppy Multiple Moving Average
    • Daily
      Guppy Multiple Moving Average is most effective for Daily timeframes. Indicators optimized for daily chart analysis, suitable for swing and position traders.
    • Weekly
      Guppy Multiple Moving Average is most effective for Weekly timeframes. Indicators optimized for weekly chart analysis, balancing short-term noise and long-term trends.

Technical Details Comparison

Usage Comparison

Evaluation Comparison

  • Pros 👍

    Advantages of using the trading indicator
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Responds Quickly To Price Changes
    • Reduces Lag Significantly
      Provides more timely signals, improving trade timing and potentially increasing profits
    Ichimoku Cloud
    • Provides Multiple Signals
    • Forward-Looking
      Indicators designed to anticipate future market movements
    Guppy Multiple Moving Average
    • Clear Visual Representation Of Trends
      Indicators offering easy-to-interpret visual cues for market trends
    • Helps Identify Trend Strength
  • Cons 👎

    Disadvantages or limitations of the trading indicator
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    Ichimoku Cloud
    • Complex To Interpret
    • Clutters Charts
    Guppy Multiple Moving Average
    • Can Be Overwhelming With Multiple Lines
    • Lag In Fast-Moving Markets

Performance Metrics Comparison

Alternatives to Hull Moving Average (HMA)
Elder Triple Screen
Known for Trend-Momentum Alignment
💯 is more reliable than Ichimoku Cloud
🔧 is more customizable than Ichimoku Cloud
is rated higher overall than Ichimoku Cloud
Moving Average Envelope
Known for Price Range Visualization
💻 is easier to use than Ichimoku Cloud
is rated higher overall than Ichimoku Cloud
Linear Regression Indicator
Known for Predicting Price Trends
💻 is easier to use than Ichimoku Cloud
Keltner Channels
Known for Combining Moving Averages With Volatility
💻 is easier to use than Ichimoku Cloud
🔧 is more customizable than Ichimoku Cloud
Chaikin Oscillator
Known for Accumulation/Distribution Trends
💻 is easier to use than Ichimoku Cloud
Awesome Oscillator (AO)
Known for Simplicity And Effectiveness
💻 is easier to use than Ichimoku Cloud
Elder Impulse System
Known for Combining Trend And Momentum
💻 is easier to use than Ichimoku Cloud