Kaufman's Adaptive Moving Average (KAMA) vs Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Volume Profile
Compact mode

Kaufman's Adaptive Moving Average (KAMA) vs Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Volume Profile

General Information Comparison

Characteristics Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 💡

    An intriguing or lesser-known fact about the trading indicator
    Kaufman's Adaptive Moving Average (KAMA)
    • Developed by Perry Kaufman in 1988
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Developed by Alan Hull to address the lag in traditional moving averages
    Volume Profile
    • Originated from Market Profile analysis
  • Sarcastic Fact 😉

    A humorous or ironic observation about the trading indicator
    Kaufman's Adaptive Moving Average (KAMA)
    • It's like a chameleon of moving averages - blends in well but can still get caught!
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Humorously called the 'moving average on steroids' by some traders
    Volume Profile
    • It's like a popularity contest for prices - but even the popular ones can let you down!

Application Comparison

  • Timeframe 🕑

    The time intervals or periods for which the trading indicator is most effective or commonly used.
    Kaufman's Adaptive Moving Average (KAMA)
    • All Timeframes
      Kaufman's Adaptive Moving Average (KAMA) is most effective for All Timeframes timeframes. Versatile indicators suitable for any trading timeframe, from short-term to long-term analysis.
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Any
      Hull Moving Average (HMA) is most effective for Any timeframes. Flexible indicators adaptable to various trading timeframes, offering versatility in analysis.
    Volume Profile
    • All Timeframes
      Volume Profile is most effective for All Timeframes timeframes. Versatile indicators suitable for any trading timeframe, from short-term to long-term analysis.

Technical Details Comparison

Usage Comparison

Evaluation Comparison

Performance Metrics Comparison