Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) vs Average Directional Index (ADX) vs McGinley Dynamic Indicator
Compact mode

Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) vs Average Directional Index (ADX) vs McGinley Dynamic Indicator

General Information Comparison

Characteristics Comparison

  • Lagging or Leading 🏁

    Indicates whether the trading indicator is a lagging or leading type, reflecting its predictive nature.
    For all*
    • Lagging
      Indicators that confirm trends after they have started
  • Complexity Level 🧑

    Indicates the level of expertise required to effectively use the indicator
    For all*
  • Popularity 🏆

    Indicates how widely used and recognized the indicator is in the trading community
    Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
    • High
      The popularity of Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) among traders is considered High. Widely used and trusted indicators in the trading community
    Average Directional Index (ADX)
    • Medium
      The popularity of Average Directional Index (ADX) among traders is considered Medium. Indicators with balanced adoption and potential effectiveness
    McGinley Dynamic Indicator
    • Low
      The popularity of McGinley Dynamic Indicator among traders is considered Low. Indicators with lower adoption but potential unique insights

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 💡

    An intriguing or lesser-known fact about the trading indicator
    Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
    • Developed by Gerald Appel
    Average Directional Index (ADX)
    • Part of the Directional Movement System
    McGinley Dynamic Indicator
    • Developed by John R. McGinley to address the lag in traditional moving averages
  • Sarcastic Fact 😉

    A humorous or ironic observation about the trading indicator
    Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
    • Even your grandma knows this one but still can't use it properly
    Average Directional Index (ADX)
    • It's like a gym membership - tells you how strong the trend is but not where it's going
    McGinley Dynamic Indicator
    • So smooth it might make other indicators jealous

Application Comparison

  • Timeframe 🕑

    The time intervals or periods for which the trading indicator is most effective or commonly used.
    For all*
    • Daily
      Indicators optimized for daily chart analysis, suitable for swing and position traders.
    • Weekly
      Indicators optimized for weekly chart analysis, balancing short-term noise and long-term trends.

Technical Details Comparison

Usage Comparison

Evaluation Comparison

Performance Metrics Comparison

Alternatives to Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
Slow Stochastic
Known for Momentum Measurement
💯 is more reliable than Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
Exponential Moving Average (EMA)
Known for Smooth Price Movements
💯 is more reliable than Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
💻 is easier to use than Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
is rated higher overall than Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
Directional Movement Index (DMI)
Known for Strength Of Price Movement
💯 is more reliable than Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
🔧 is more customizable than Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
Keltner Channels
Known for Combining Moving Averages With Volatility
💯 is more reliable than Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
🔧 is more customizable than Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)
Hull Moving Average (HMA)
Known for Reducing Lag In Moving Averages
💯 is more reliable than Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD)