Rate of Change (ROC) vs Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Moving Average Envelope
Compact mode

Rate Of Change (ROC) vs Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Moving Average Envelope

General Information Comparison

Characteristics Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 💡

    An intriguing or lesser-known fact about the trading indicator
    Rate of Change (ROC)
    • One of the oldest momentum indicators still in use today
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Developed by Alan Hull to address the lag in traditional moving averages
    Moving Average Envelope
    • Envelopes typically use 2% above and below the moving average
  • Sarcastic Fact 😉

    A humorous or ironic observation about the trading indicator
    Rate of Change (ROC)
    • Jokingly called the 'market speedometer' by some traders
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Humorously called the 'moving average on steroids' by some traders
    Moving Average Envelope
    • Often mistaken for Bollinger Bands by novice traders

Application Comparison

  • Timeframe 🕑

    The time intervals or periods for which the trading indicator is most effective or commonly used.
    Rate of Change (ROC)
    • Any
      Rate of Change (ROC) is most effective for Any timeframes. Flexible indicators adaptable to various trading timeframes, offering versatility in analysis.
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Any
      Hull Moving Average (HMA) is most effective for Any timeframes. Flexible indicators adaptable to various trading timeframes, offering versatility in analysis.
    Moving Average Envelope
    • Daily
      Moving Average Envelope is most effective for Daily timeframes. Indicators optimized for daily chart analysis, suitable for swing and position traders.
    • Weekly
      Moving Average Envelope is most effective for Weekly timeframes. Indicators optimized for weekly chart analysis, balancing short-term noise and long-term trends.

Technical Details Comparison

Evaluation Comparison

Performance Metrics Comparison