Rate of Change (ROC) vs Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Stochastic Oscillator
Compact mode

Rate Of Change (ROC) vs Hull Moving Average (HMA) vs Stochastic Oscillator

General Information Comparison

Characteristics Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 💡

    An intriguing or lesser-known fact about the trading indicator
    Rate of Change (ROC)
    • One of the oldest momentum indicators still in use today
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Developed by Alan Hull to address the lag in traditional moving averages
    Stochastic Oscillator
    • Developed by George Lane
  • Sarcastic Fact 😉

    A humorous or ironic observation about the trading indicator
    Rate of Change (ROC)
    • Jokingly called the 'market speedometer' by some traders
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Humorously called the 'moving average on steroids' by some traders
    Stochastic Oscillator
    • It's as unpredictable as a teenager's mood swings

Application Comparison

  • Timeframe 🕑

    The time intervals or periods for which the trading indicator is most effective or commonly used.
    Rate of Change (ROC)
    • Any
      Rate of Change (ROC) is most effective for Any timeframes. Flexible indicators adaptable to various trading timeframes, offering versatility in analysis.
    Hull Moving Average (HMA)
    • Any
      Hull Moving Average (HMA) is most effective for Any timeframes. Flexible indicators adaptable to various trading timeframes, offering versatility in analysis.
    Stochastic Oscillator
    • 5-Minute
      Stochastic Oscillator is most effective for 5-Minute timeframes. Indicators optimized for analyzing rapid market movements on a 5-minute timeframe
    • 15-Minute
      Stochastic Oscillator is most effective for 15-Minute timeframes. Indicators suited for analyzing market data on a 15-minute timeframe
    • 1-Hour
      Stochastic Oscillator is most effective for 1-Hour timeframes. Indicators optimized for analyzing market data on a 1-hour timeframe

Technical Details Comparison

Evaluation Comparison

Performance Metrics Comparison