Compact mode
Bombardier Q300 vs ATR 42-600
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.Bombardier Q300ATR 42-600Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Both*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.Bombardier Q300ATR 42-600Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.Both*Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Both*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Both*Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Both*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftBombardier Q300- Features active noise control system
ATR 42-600- Can land on unpaved runways
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftBombardier Q300- The whispering workhorse
ATR 42-600- Pilots joke it's more reliable than their marriages
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.Bombardier Q300ATR 42-600Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Both*- Regional JetRegional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeBombardier Q300- Regional CarriersBombardier Q300 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- CommutersBombardier Q300 is primarily operated by Commuters. Aircraft designed for frequent short-haul flights, prioritizing efficiency Click to see all.
ATR 42-600- Regional AirlinesATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
- Regional MarketsATR 42-600 is primarily operated by Regional Markets. Airplanes designed specifically for serving regional markets with focus on efficiency and reliability Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillBombardier Q300- Regional RoutesBombardier Q300 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Island HoppingBombardier Q300 is primarily used for Island Hopping.
ATR 42-600- Short RoutesATR 42-600 is primarily used for Short Routes. Aircraft designed for efficient short-distance travel Click to see all.
- Remote LocationsATR 42-600 is primarily used for Remote Locations. Aircraft specialized in serving isolated and difficult-to-reach areas Click to see all.
- Short-HaulATR 42-600 is primarily used for Short-Haul.
- Island RoutesATR 42-600 is primarily used for Island Routes. Aircraft designed for inter-island transportation services Click to see all.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftBombardier Q300- Noise ReductionBombardier Q300 is known for Noise Reduction.
- EfficiencyBombardier Q300 is known for Efficiency.
ATR 42-600- Fuel EfficiencyATR 42-600 is known for Fuel Efficiency.
- ReliabilityATR 42-600 is known for Reliability.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoth*- Low Operating Costs
- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways
ATR 42-600- Short Runway Capability
- Robust DesignAircraft built for durability and reliability
- Fuel EfficientAircraft optimized for minimal fuel consumption and environmental impact Click to see all.
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoth*- Weather SensitivityAircraft requiring specific weather conditions for safe operation
- Limited RangeAircraft that can only operate on shorter routes due to fuel capacity or efficiency limitations
ATR 42-600
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyBombardier Q300ATR 42-600Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesBombardier Q300ATR 42-600Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresBombardier Q300ATR 42-600
Alternatives to Bombardier Q300
ATR 72-400
Known for Cost Effectiveness
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-600
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600
ATR 72-200
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-600
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-600
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-600
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-600
ATR 42-500
Known for Fuel Economy
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-600
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-600
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-600
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-600
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-600
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-600
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-600
ATR 42-300
Known for Fuel Economy,Reliability
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-600
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-600
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-600
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-600
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-600
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-600
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-600
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-600
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-600
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-600
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 42-600
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-600
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-600
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-600
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-600
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-600
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-600
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-600
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-600
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-600
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-600
BAe 146-200
Known for Quiet Operation,STOL Capability
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-600
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-600
🚀
flies higher than ATR 42-600
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-600
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-600
Airbus A220-300
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Modern Design
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 42-600
👥
has more seats than ATR 42-600
🌍
flies longer than ATR 42-600
🚀
flies higher than ATR 42-600
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 42-600
🛡
is safer than ATR 42-600
⏳
is more durable than ATR 42-600
⭐
is better overall than ATR 42-600