Compact mode
ATR 72-200 vs Bombardier Q300
Table of content
Basic Information Comparison
Manufacturer 🏢
The company responsible for designing and manufacturing the aircraft, representing the primary producer of the commercial airplane.ATR 72-200Bombardier Q300Engine Type ✈
A crucial component that defines the aircraft's propulsion system and performance characteristics,determining factors in speed,range and operational capabilities.Both*
Performance Comparison
Maximum Range 🌍
The maximum distance the aircraft can fly without refueling, measured in nautical miles.ATR 72-200Bombardier Q300Fuel Efficiency ⛽
Measures how efficiently the aircraft consumes fuel during operation,typically expressed in nautical miles per gallon or fuel burn rate.ATR 72-200Bombardier Q300Fuel Efficiency Type ⛽
Classification of the aircraft's fuel consumption efficiency level,helping operators understand relative efficiency.Both*Maximum Altitude 🚀
The highest altitude at which the aircraft can safely and effectively operate,affecting route planning and operational capabilities.Both*Maximum Altitude Type 🚀
Classification of the aircraft's maximum operational altitude capability,categorizing its high-altitude performance.Both*
Facts Comparison
Interesting Fact 📖
Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraftATR 72-200- Best Selling Turboprop
Bombardier Q300- Features active noise control system
Sarcastic Fact 🤣
Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraftATR 72-200- Can land on water if you try hard enough
Bombardier Q300- The whispering workhorse
Commercial Comparison
Specifications Comparison
Seating Capacity 👥
The maximum number of passengers that can be accommodated in the aircraft's standard configuration, determining its operational capacity.ATR 72-200Bombardier Q300Seating Capacity Type ✈️
Classification of aircraft based on their passenger capacity, categorizing them into different operational segments.Both*- Regional JetRegional jets are smaller commercial aircraft, typically seating 50-100 passengers, designed for short to medium routes
General Comparison
For whom 👤
Target user groups or organizations that typically operate this aircraft typeATR 72-200- Regional AirlinesATR 72-200 is primarily operated by Regional Airlines. Aircraft optimized for short to medium regional routes Click to see all.
- Island HoppersATR 72-200 is primarily operated by Island Hoppers.
Bombardier Q300- Regional CarriersBombardier Q300 is primarily operated by Regional Carriers. Aircraft specialized for regional route operations Click to see all.
- CommutersBombardier Q300 is primarily operated by Commuters. Aircraft designed for frequent short-haul flights, prioritizing efficiency Click to see all.
Purpose 🎯
Primary purposes and missions the aircraft is designed to fulfillATR 72-200- Short Distance RoutesATR 72-200 is primarily used for Short Distance Routes.
Bombardier Q300- Regional RoutesBombardier Q300 is primarily used for Regional Routes. Aircraft optimized for short-distance regional travel Click to see all.
- Island HoppingBombardier Q300 is primarily used for Island Hopping.
Features Comparison
Known For 💡
Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraftATR 72-200- Fuel EconomyATR 72-200 is known for Fuel Economy.
- ReliabilityATR 72-200 is known for Reliability.
Bombardier Q300- Noise ReductionBombardier Q300 is known for Noise Reduction.
- EfficiencyBombardier Q300 is known for Efficiency.
Pros ➕
Key advantages and strong points of the aircraftBoth*- Low Operating Costs
ATR 72-200- Short Runway Capability
Bombardier Q300- Short Runway CapableAircraft designed for operations on compact runways
Cons ➖
Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraftBoth*ATR 72-200- Speed Limitations
Bombardier Q300
Ratings Comparison
Reliability Score 🔧
Reliability rating based on maintenance records and operational historyATR 72-200Bombardier Q300Comfort Score 💱
Passenger comfort rating considering cabin design and amenitiesATR 72-200Bombardier Q300Safety Score 🛡
Safety rating based on accident history and safety featuresATR 72-200Bombardier Q300
Alternatives to ATR 72-200
ATR 72-700
Known for Fuel Efficient Turboprop
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-200
🌍
flies longer than ATR 72-200
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-200
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-200
ATR 72-500
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
🌍
flies longer than ATR 72-200
⛽
is more fuel efficient than ATR 72-200
ATR 72-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧
is more reliable than ATR 72-200
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-200
🌍
flies longer than ATR 72-200
Saab 340
Known for Reliability,Efficiency
🌍
flies longer than ATR 72-200
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-200
Dornier 328JET
Known for German Engineering
🌍
flies longer than ATR 72-200
🚀
flies higher than ATR 72-200
Airbus A330-800Neo
Known for New Generation Efficiency
👥
has more seats than ATR 72-200
🌍
flies longer than ATR 72-200
🚀
flies higher than ATR 72-200
💱
is more comfortable than ATR 72-200
🛡
is safer than ATR 72-200
⭐
is better overall than ATR 72-200