BAe 146-200 vs Airbus A300-600 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-10
Compact mode

BAe 146-200 vs Airbus A300-600 vs McDonnell Douglas DC-10

Table of content

Performance Comparison

Facts Comparison

  • Interesting Fact 📖
    Unique historical or technical fact about the aircraft
    BAe 146-200
    • Only successful British commercial jet
    Airbus A300-600
    • First twin-engine widebody
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10
    • Last commercial tri-jet by McDonnell Douglas

  • Sarcastic Fact 🤣
    Humorous or ironic observation about the aircraft
    BAe 146-200
    • The Whisperjet that couldn't whisper profits
    Airbus A300-600
    • Too old to retire too young to collect pension
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10
    • Known as the plane that wanted three engines because it was greedy

Specifications Comparison

General Comparison

Features Comparison

  • Known For 💡
    Distinctive characteristic or notable feature of the aircraft
    BAe 146-200
    • Quiet Operation
      BAe 146-200 is known for Quiet Operation.
    • STOL Capability
      BAe 146-200 is known for STOL Capability.
    Airbus A300-600
    • First Airbus Aircraft
      Airbus A300-600 is known for First Airbus Aircraft.
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10
    • Tri-Engine Design
      McDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Tri-Engine Design.
    • Cargo Conversion
      McDonnell Douglas DC-10 is known for Cargo Conversion.

  • Pros ➕
    Key advantages and strong points of the aircraft
    BAe 146-200
    • Low Noise Levels
    • Short Runway Use
      Aircraft suitable for limited runway length operations
    Airbus A300-600
    • Proven Design
      Aircraft with established reliability and performance record
    • Cargo Capability
    • Durable
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10
    • Good Range
      Aircraft with sufficient range for typical regional operations
    • Cargo Capacity
    • Passenger Comfort

  • Cons ➖
    Main disadvantages or limitations of the aircraft
    For all*
    BAe 146-200
    • Fuel Consumption
    Airbus A300-600
    • Dated Technology
    McDonnell Douglas DC-10
    • Fuel Inefficiency
    • Dated Systems

Ratings Comparison

Alternatives to BAe 146-200
BAe 146
Known for Quiet Operation
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
Dornier 328JET
Known for German Engineering
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
Bombardier CRJ-900
Known for Reliability,Cost Efficiency
🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200
⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
McDonnell Douglas MD-90
Known for Fuel Efficiency
🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200
👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146-200
ATR 42-600
Known for Fuel Efficiency,Reliability
⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
Bombardier CRJ-500
Known for Versatility
🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
🛡 is safer than BAe 146-200
Bombardier CRJ-550
Known for Comfort,Efficiency
⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
💱 is more comfortable than BAe 146-200
🛡 is safer than BAe 146-200
⏳ is more durable than BAe 146-200
⭐ is better overall than BAe 146-200
Airbus A310-300
Known for Fuel Efficiency
👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
⛽ is more fuel efficient than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
Boeing 737-200
Known for Durability
👥 has more seats than BAe 146-200
🌍 flies longer than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
Bombardier CRJ-100
Known for Regional Efficiency
🔧 is more reliable than BAe 146-200
🚀 flies higher than BAe 146-200
🛡 is safer than BAe 146-200