Does it handle discounts or shortages?
Mistake: Treating a result as valid outside the described scope.
Fix: No. Purchase cost, quantity discounts, safety stock, capacity and uncertain lead times are excluded.
Balance ordering and holding costs for an inventory buyer.
This tool is archived. Recheck its method and dated data before use.
Runs offline in your browser. Once the page and required files have loaded, processing needs no internet.
Runs in your browser
Balance ordering and holding costs for an inventory buyer.
Runs in your browser
Inputs are processed on this page and are never sent to a server.
Use one currency throughout. Compare the pack multiples immediately below and above √(2DS/H). The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins. Assumes constant demand and immediate replenishment.
Q* = √(2DS/H); K(Q) = DS/Q + HQ/2
Units per order: 600 Annual relevant cost: 1,900 currency units Orders per year: 20
Q* = √(2DS/H); K(Q) = DS/Q + HQ/2
Units per order: 600 Annual relevant cost: 1,900 currency units Orders per year: 20
No. Purchase cost, quantity discounts, safety stock, capacity and uncertain lead times are excluded.
Calculations run on your device. Form inputs are not sent to a server.
The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins.
Enter a numerical value for this quantity.
Minimum: 1 · Maximum: 1000000000000
The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins.
Enter a numerical value for this quantity.
Minimum: 1e-9 · Maximum: 1000000000000
The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins.
Enter a numerical value for this quantity.
Minimum: 1e-9 · Maximum: 1000000000000
Compare the pack multiples immediately below and above √(2DS/H).
Enter a whole number; fractional counts are not valid.
Minimum: 1 · Maximum: 1000000000
Use one currency throughout. Compare the pack multiples immediately below and above √(2DS/H). The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins. Assumes constant demand and immediate replenishment.
Calculated from your entries using the method below.
The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins.
Calculated from your entries using the method below.
The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins.
Calculated from your entries using the method below.
Use one currency throughout. Compare the pack multiples immediately below and above √(2DS/H). The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins. Assumes constant demand and immediate replenishment.
Calculated from your entries using the method below.
Use one currency throughout. Compare the pack multiples immediately below and above √(2DS/H). The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins. Assumes constant demand and immediate replenishment.
Calculated from your entries using the method below.
Use one currency throughout. Compare the pack multiples immediately below and above √(2DS/H). The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins. Assumes constant demand and immediate replenishment.
Calculated from your entries using the method below.
The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins.
Calculated from your entries using the method below.
The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins.
Calculated from your entries using the method below.
Use one currency throughout. Compare the pack multiples immediately below and above √(2DS/H). The lower annual ordering-plus-holding cost wins. Assumes constant demand and immediate replenishment.
Calculated from your entries using the method below.
Mistake: Treating a result as valid outside the described scope.
Fix: No. Purchase cost, quantity discounts, safety stock, capacity and uncertain lead times are excluded.
Read how ListFan and third-party services handle your data. See GDPR policy